use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
I am an incel ama
submitted 1 year ago by AnimeRespecter from self.whatever
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (30 children)
false dichotomy fallacy. the dichotomy isnt "getting with people less atractive than you" vs "getting with people more attractive than you". the dichotomy is "getting with people less atractive than you" vs "getting with people more attractive than you" vs "getting with people as attractive as you and up". women choose "getting with people more attractive than you" rather than "getting with people as attractive as you and up". note that I never said anything about dating down in terms of looks, but you have repeatedly said I have.
[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Because he is a modern scum aka a numale
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
women choose "getting with people more attractive than you"
I would argue that's not quite the case, well perhaps it's more prevailing in youth, but I always see men punching above their weight when it come to relationships. Many women like a gorilla, or a dad-bod, or a big hairy teddy bear with neanderthal face. Everyone is different and has different interests, this type of generalisation doesn't quite match reality outside of daytime television and the super picky world of tinder.
[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
😮
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Mm
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (25 children)
It's practically the same. What you're saying is like saying >= is nothing like >. In the vast majority of cases they have the same outcome.
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (24 children)
Absolutely they are not the same. because if its true that women have the abnormally high standards in the way that I said then we should stop that through social shame.
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (23 children)
No, we need to relieve men of their desperation.
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (22 children)
ok woman. say we relieve men of their desperation, that wont stop the incel problem because women will still have insanely high standards
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (21 children)
The whole reason the incel problem exists is because women can get almost any guy they want, which is because men will fuck almost any woman.
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (20 children)
listen here roastie, if men arent desperate women will not start magically dating average men, they will still only want chad so they will all sleep with chad, and he will cycle through them, sleeping with all of them but settling for none because he has so many options. none of what I just outlined requires men to have low standards.
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (12 children)
Chad must have pretty low standards to sleep with every woman.
You don't seem to understand that if men weren't so desperate and had such low standards, women would have to deal with mens' high standards too. Then the power imbalance would be corrected.
[–][deleted] 1 year ago* (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
And so would men. So if either lower on the totem pole wanted a partner, they'd have to settle for less. If not they can live with it and not be incels.
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (6 children)
every foid wants chad, so if every men wants stacy the only people who will end up in relationships will be chad and stacies ad average people wont get into them at all. that's the thing women strictly adhere to their standards in the sense that women will choose to get with noone over their male equivalent.
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
That's only because Chad will take all of them as it stands. If all women couldn't get with Chad they would be forced to settle for someone more on their level, just like men are right now.
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (6 children)
Btw I'm no roastie. I like bondage not sex.
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
female equals roastie therefore you are a roastie
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
I've never had sex so I can't be a roastie.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (30 children)
[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (25 children)
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (24 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (23 children)
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (22 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (21 children)
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (20 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–][deleted] (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)