use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
I got banned from Twitter for one week.
submitted 1 year ago by troubleshooter from self.whatever
So I registered another account using an old inactive Android.
I didn't need a phone number.
https://files.catbox.moe/wmfkkk.png
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (8 children)
Oh, Eddie...what did you do this time? 😔
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (7 children)
It was nothing really.. I was just testing the waters..
https://files.catbox.moe/bj4t3b.png
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (6 children)
You didn't even use foul language. Impressive.
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (5 children)
these demotards phrase things so that no matter how you answer or respond, you are wrong.
i don't even fully understand how to do it, but i recognize that they are doing this..
they do something like this:
they might say "the republicans want to NOT ALLOW ABORTION and they want to STOP BUDWEISER FROM BREWING BEER and they want to STOP ALLOWING CHILDREN TO HAVE CANDY AND ICE CREAM".
they put two or more issues together that are not even similar issues.. they make it impossible to respond and not look stupid.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Of course they do. If someone doesn't have any substantive argument, they will cast accusations to prevent continuation of any debate to shut you down. Once they shut you down, they win by default even though their points suck. "Yeah well that's sexist-transfat-veganphobia that offends islamic minor marriage, you racist bigot". It's so unbelievably dumb that it doesn't even warrant a dignified response.
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
they teach you in college how to turn a nice conversation into a circular clusterfuck, don't they?
is there a name for this type of logic or debate that goes nowhere?
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Reductio ad Hitlerum, aka playing the Nazi card to shut down conversation.
[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
That's my favourite fallacy!
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (7 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]troubleshooter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)