People Dropping

submitted by StillLessons from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It doubles as a lower bound. It could be an exponential correlation. We actually don't know this so far. Or do we?

So that, lets say, after the fifth or sixth jab you are like 95% dead, statistically speaking.

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Canada has bought 11 jabs for every person. To kill?

Women have 2x more side-effects, and there is a huge difference between people and between batches.
But there is one man who took many injections. We need to know his health status and why he seems immune to the side-effects.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This effect in women is quite classical after the roll-out of some big thing in pharma-tech.

For their medical studies, they "like" using men more because they don't have to factor in the rather complex effects of the feminine hormone system. This basically is the same thing for every drug that isn't "female only", so to say.

On the other hand, because with mRNA jabs, they basically are exploring uncharted territory in cell-engineering, it isn't astounding that epigenetics has this sort of influence on the actual effect regarding the individual patient.

If they can't guarantee the quality of the jabs themselves, they should be sued into oblivion for damages. On your side of the big pond, this even is possible, afaik.

We only got this lame-ass von der Leyen-puppet that blocked off most of this legal opportunities behind closed doors with an army of BigPharma lawyers, sadly.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This effect in women is quite classical after the roll-out of some big thing in pharma-tech.

For their medical studies, they "like" using men more because they don't have to factor in the rather complex effects of the feminine hormone system.

No doubt, they'll soon start including "women" with male endowments for their research.

Solutions in "$cience".