you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chottohen 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Better yet, why not have a fallback site and sub where we can meet and regroup if saidit goes down for good? In the present (US) political climate, that seems not so unlikely.

[–]EternalSunset 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

MeWe is pro free speech, you guys should check it out.

There is also Minds, but it sucks hard. It's a Twitter clone and you have to pay for anyone to even see your posts.

I think everyone here probably already knows about Gab and Parler, but both of those suck hard too in my opinion.

[–]package 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Lmao at that MeWe site:

Unlike other social networks, at MeWe we have absolutely no political agenda and no one can pay us to target you with theirs. MeWe is for law-abiding and TOS-abiding people everywhere in the world, regardless of political, ethnic, religious, sexual, and other preferences. We have a strict and clear Terms of Service protecting our members: haters, bullies, porn, spammers, bots, lawbreakers, violence inciters, etc. are prohibited.

Then in the TOS:

You may NOT:

...

Post content that is hateful, threatening, harmful, incites violence; or contains graphic or gratuitous violence.

Wow such clarity and not at all worded in a way where it can disallow basically anything they want /s

[–]IndianaJonesIf I asked you for a hug, would you say yes?[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Post content that is hateful, threatening

Does soliciting random people on the internet for hugs count as threatening content?