We're not grooming the children, we're just putting gay porn in the middle school library and encouraging them to go on gay sex hookup apps. It's perfectly wholesome!

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (justthenews.com)

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Alienhunter 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Kids remember if you dont want these books in your library here's what you do.

Just take them out. Don't check them out just take them. Dispose of them. If you get caught just say you wanted to check it out but we're afraid of getting in trouble with your parents. You'll not get in trouble. Afterwards just play dumb. They can't contact your parents about it without outing you so they won't.

Don't tell anyone you're going to do it. Don't write about it. Just do it. Take the book, dump it, let the library figure out what happened to it.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

My lawyer says to not tell you that's a good idea.

[–]IkeConn 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Queers have been plotting to take over education for 50 years.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they've been succeeding rather

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]RamblingOtter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I have had some younger women in my time and I swear the younger they get, the more they initiate some very disturbing stuff in the bedroom. And yet when questioned, they think it's demanded of them and don't actually enjoy it.

    One girl I was with would just suddenly talk weird like some fucking anime character and say shit like, "Don't hurt me Daddy". I have never lost the mood in an intimate encounter as quickly as I did at that moment.

    It really is fucking up younger people, all this weird pornography. Girls think they have to insert melons in their arses and the boys have absolutely no idea whatsoever how girls' bodies actually work - I heard a story from one girl where her ex boyfriend went with unannounced anal sex just like in the pornos and was all surprised when she practically punched him one from the pain of it.

    That is before you have girls wanting to cut their not even appearing yet tits off, or men wanting to stretch the end of their penises out to become vaginas.

    The kids are under attack from these fucking groomers. I will happily teach my kids to tell me the second any person that isn't straight starts to befriend them. It has come to that. I am as accepting as the next guy, but no grown up but me or the teachers need to talk to my kids. And if you're obviously not a straight person, I will be looking hard at you. I didn't make it this way, you fucking cunts did. All they are for is confusing kids and trying to fuck their heads up to the same levels that they are.

    [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    as accepting as the next guy

    I'm not. Gays need to keep their gay stuff in the closet around my kids.

    [–]DirewolfGhost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Honestly as they don't have a genetic interest in the future of society, I'm not sure why it would make sense they can vote or work for the government. I guess when the draft happened it made sense. What are the responsibilities tied to the privilege of voting again?

    [–]sushipark34 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    that's so terrible, it gave me vertigo. ヾ(＠⌒ー⌒＠)ノ they think they're better than us.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Viruses are relentless. A multitude of folks eagerly await the moment that HIV packet of chemicals alters its structure slightly rendering current treatments ineffective AND . . . creating a new version of AIDS with 100% lethality that strikes down the virus bearer within days of contracting the disease.

    The funeral industry will shout with joy at the huge business increase. Public restrooms in parks and other locales where the Gay boys engage in their lustful activities will become wholesome again as the Gay population declines precipitously. The mass perversions where in the past many thousands of LGBTQ+ freaks gathered for their Pride and Gay Day parades will see crowds in the new era of 2 or 3 haggard survivors wondering when they will join their comrades in butt sex in the grave.

    Yes, herd. Great days are coming and they need but the tiny spark of viral evolution to arrive.

    [–]FozzieBear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Bullshit.

    Rather than read this misinformation, think for a second that anyone can get this book, here (a basic search will locate it):

    https://eu1lib.vip/book/2518512/1bbdac

    And now you too can read through it, while also noticing that there is nothing odd in the book. It's a very simple, vanilla approach to some aspects of LGTB+ whatever. Kids need parenting, not useless parents who prefer instead to attack schools. How pathetic. And after reading the book, do let me know if this changed your mind about your own sexual interests.

    [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    • You know who doesn't need to be learning about fag shit? Middle schoolers

    This book:

    • brainwashes children to think not only is gay okay, but trans is valid, both of which are false
    • it teaches children to distrust their teachers, which is wicked
    • it is encouraging them to be deviants, which is evil
    • it brainwashes children to think heterosex is somehow not the norm (90%+ = normal BTW)
    • it conflates trans and gay, which is blatantly false
    • it is encouraging middle school children to have sex, which is wildly inappropriate
    • it brainwashes children to think whatever they identify as is valid (e.g. you can identify as a carrot)
    • it is intentionally confusing regarding the word gay
    • it brainwashes children to think the sexuality binary is actually bad
    • it brainwashes children to think being queer is good (hint it's not)
    • it encourages children to experiment with different kinds of sex, which is wildly inappropriate
    • it teaches children to question their parents, their traditions, and their culture, which is wickedness
    • it presents normalcy (cisgender) as somehow the other position, which is confusion, which is evil considering it's in a MIDDLE SCHOOL library
    • it comes right out and says It doesn't matter why someone has the sexuality they do. Which is false. When a majority of queers and especially the trains are either abused, pornsick, otherwise insane, or a combination of the above, it matters a great deal why someone would choose to reject the default, normal, god-approved sexual norms.
    • it tries to bamboozle children into thinking some people are born trans, which is blatantly false but there's a lot of pseudoscientific speculation presented as authoritative on the subject.
    • it pretends we don't have control over our desires, which is false but a good way to lead a child astray
    • it presents as difinitive that one is born gay, which is false and a wicked thing to try to convince a child is true!
    • there's a whole section to get children to empathize with queers based on strawen
    • it then bashes all stereotypes, which is a dangerous fallacy seeing as stereotypes ALL have bases in reality and are a valuable guide for many many MANY situations
    • it encourages children to think of themselves as gay
    • it subverts the meanings of useful words, which is wickedness
    • somehow it implies that non-gayness is because of self-hatred
    • it discourages children from thinking along non-approved (by the superqueer author) lines
    • it discourages children from doing things because they are approved by others/the culture/their parents, which is wickedness

    I made it through chapter four and found a whole hecking lot of stuff that is completely, unabashedly, WILDLY inappropriate to be in a school library. I skimmed through the rest to have a glance at illustrations and found

    • a bit that shits on biblical beliefs, which is wicked and probably illegal as it is prejudicial against at least three major religions.
    • explicit descriptions of how to have all kinds of sex. Again, this is for middle schoolers wildly inappropriate
    • it teaches CHILDREN that sex parties are okay and appropriate (hint: they're not)
    • it introduces CHILDREN to grindr!
    • the epub version has handy links to websites to further subvert the morality of our youth

    This book should be burned and the author should be either imprisoned for life, face a firing squad, or be exiled and never allowed to interact with Americans, ever. In a just world. It's rubbish and poison for the impressionable minds of young people.

    But a good thing did come from this conversation. I now have a decent .epub file reader, so I have that going for me, which is nice.

    My own sexual interests are

    normal: superstraight

    [–]FozzieBear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    We'll both agree that the school library does not require the book. But we certainly do not agree on the long list of what you think the book encourages or teaches. It merely offers information about sexuality. I I don't think it's a dangerous book. Think for example of the porn that kids have had access to in recent years. This book is a better way to learn about sexuality. My view is that parents can address this topic at home. That said, the biology class in middle school should also address some basic aspects of sexuality, as this is part of a normal biology program. We're not in a country where the Taliban, or Putin, or others can dictate what kind of information we can access and which sexuality we must identify with. If a kid is confused because he likes boys more than he likes girls, perhaps he should ask his parents or read this book. The book is not a danger to anyone and will not make children gay, in my view. It doesn't argue for the awesomeness ot being gay, for example. None of us here know enough about child psychology to claim that a book like this can encouage kids to be LGBTQ+ or whatever they think they might be. They need good parenting to keep their personal life choices at home. To assume that the book does all that you claim it does is a tough sell. I appreciate the long, thoughtful list of arguments, which offer a good place to start with a discussion about this book. The simple fact is that: we cannot legislate morality, or indeed an individual's decision about his/her sexuality. We all want to learn about sexuality when we are younger (and kids like me didn't really understand sexuality in middle school, as curious as we were about girls, and no matter how often we looked at Playboy magazines - tells you a bit about my age). It's better to study in a thoughtful manner with basic books like this, and/or to work with one's parents, then to have NOTHING to read, or to have no discussion. The lack of information is what can harm a kid, who should never make desicions about serious personal matters from a position of ignorance or without consultation with their parents. Many kids don't want to talk to their parents about their sexuality. I would never recommend that they depend on guidance from friends, who also know very little at that time. This book seems to be a reasonable explanation in very simple terms, and I seriously doubt that it would change a kid's mind about his/her own sexuality. The book can, however, teach tolerance about the sexuality of one'e self and especially of others, and thereby save a kid from personal harm or harming others. What's really important is that these approaches to one's sexuality remain a private matter, and that this privacy is respected by others. This book and the minority of LGBTQ+ folks aren't a danger to child development, and more importantly, we all need to learn at an earliy age how to live with an increasingly complicated world.

    [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    or you can ignore that it's blatant pro-queer propaganda that's something you could also do

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Linked-to site is GAY!!!!!!

    [–]RamblingOtter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    So, the first listing that implores the various likes, where does it say that "sometimes men like women" or "Sometimes women like men?" Is this not an option?

    Why does the introduction touch on the standard insecurities that a child approaching adolescence or beginning puberty feels and attempts to offer explanation? The entire introduction reads from the viewpoint of someone who is naturally confused.

    It then offers membership to an exclusive club that is fun, free and inspirational. What confused near-teen wouldn't trade all their insecurities away for such membership? This is indoctrination, nothing more. I saw it myself with my uber religious surroundings growing up, everything was about indoctrination. And this is absolutely no different at all.

    The interaction between the mother and her son was disturbing. Because the Mother suggested that the boy will enjoy kissing girls, the writer wanted to call social services on them? For real? But if the Mother said, "Oh yes, you will enjoy sucking cock!" will that have been OK?

    What the pie chart shows (and rather poorly and inaccurately) is the ages of when people go through puberty. It again is pure propaganda designed to work and amuse young people.

    I did rather enjoy the part about the trans people taking hormones. In a history of time to come, I feel that these passages will serve as a rather grimacing reminder of what the 2020s people got up to. Rather like when you read about the use of leaches, trepanation or lobotomy, I feel people of the future will look back at these tomes with their childlike appearance in a bid for acceptance as the shuddering and frightful things that they are.

    Seriously this is not an acceptable thing for people to read. It is the pure indoctrination and resemblance to the target audience's own feelings they will naturally have at the time of pubescence. And believe me, I have read things like this before. An (ex) friend once gave me some literature about a white power organisation he was in - also why I chose not to associate with him anymore. But the literature itself was fascinating. It was compelling, targeted and befitted its audience well. Whomever had written it had done so with an intelligence that it could have won marketing awards. This book to me is absolutely no different. It is designed for one purpose only. It was designed to reach young white men who felt that they had gotten a raw deal, unsuccessful professionally and in school life, hard done by and were particularly in areas with a highly diverse community, especially where those people seemed to be in good order financially, such as shop owners, landlords, etc. And, just like this book, it included truthisms. That is, if you can say one thing that we all know to be true, you can take that truth on a little ride to something else that you can claim has corollary with that truthism and make that true too. Reading the first 20 or so pages of this book, I may as well have been reading that white power literature all them years ago, just like I may as well have been reading the Christian indoctrination childrens' books when I was young.

    The people around it and the marketing materials do not change. Just the ideologies and the target audiences.

    Sure, one thing is not like the other, I don't view a typical Christian or even gay person as an insidious person as someone screaming out heil hitler 80 years after the event. But I do view the indoctrination as such as insidious and the fact that it targets children to me is sick-inducing. Heterosexuality is the default for a reason. It's how humans procreate! To quote some comedian, us heteros, we fucking make you!

    Any parent wants the best for their children and in these times of hardship, those lucky enough to be able to factor in children financially want even more the best for that child. Then this book comes out that preaches, indoctrinates and absolutely insists on fucking with their minds to the point of having boys cutting off their penises or girls chopping off their tits, that to me is harmful and fucked up. I have yet to see an innocent trans, they are all of the same mentality. Just like the white power lot or any religious group, they all want people to be as fucked up as they are.

    To put it bluntly, if anyone ever comes near my child with this bullshit under the pretence of "it's just information if they want it", they know what they're doing. And they know what I will do in response. I'll cut their genitalia off for them, no surgery needed. I just won't be as delicate about it!

    Added, you also need only think about how neo-trans people gained their acceptance in the first place. To my memory, there were always trans people. They kept to themselves and were amusing to see in public on the extreme rare occasion that you might see a bloke walking around dressed up as some 17th Century woman figure. Neo trans are entirely different. They are ugly, usually unintelligent and use every possible mouthpiece to preach about trans activism.

    They realised that membership into the LGBT club would be easy and the simplest way for them to enjoy the protections that club contained as well as defence from any naysayers. Now that they have essentially all but hijacked that club and used it to its own ends, the neo-trans realise that in order to gain even more acceptance and to create more of themselves (indoctrination), kids are the easiest to target, the least experienced and if a child demands to be identified as trans, the parents will usually have little option but to work with that child about that issue, whether accepting it or getting treatment for their obvious gender dysphoria or attempting to locate the source of the indoctrination and cutting it off (which is what should happen).

    By barraging into the LGBT club and enjoying those protections, they have coerced schools and other authority figures not only to protect them, but also encourage their efforts to indoctrinate whoever they want to for fear of extreme reprisal.

    Neo trans is a real movement with little in terms of legitimacy at its heart and a lot in terms of mental health issues - extreme mental health issues. Its material is targeted and the fact that they are not only permitted but even encouraged to engage with children without their parents knowledge - actively protected by schools too - is extremely scary. Putting thoughts and brainwashing children outside of the standard national curriculums is why parents are very very rightfully angry.

    You cannot pass off the efforts of the neo-trans as simple a person coming of age and deciding they prefer same-sex relationships, insert hard road of realisation and self acceptance here, this is indoctrination and there is a huge difference. And this is what the neo-trans are doing. And you know what? I am far more travelled than you or your kind. I know a trans person who has been trans for nearly 40 years nearing his 60s now. I've worked with him for about 12 of those years. He doesn't boast about trans-ness every chance he gets, he doesn't resent anyone referring to him as he or she, doesn't resent people using his male or female name, has absolutely no demand for people to go mad with pronouns. And he really - really - hates neo-trans. Because the neo-trans have aligned people like him into that same category of targeting children, it has pushed him (and those he does trans things with) very much more into the shadows.

    So a typical melting pot where people in the LGBT community that hold the same letter don't like neo-trans. And that little stunt where the neo-trans demanded Lesbians accept men who dress as women as sexual equal and excluding them from their own club? Fucking priceless. The left truly does eat itself.

    The thing is, most people recognise you neo-trans types and what you are up to. And all I can say is, you will not enjoy these same protections for long. And certainly not from me. Frankly, I am smarter than you and I have seen far more than you have.