Step-by-step guide to squirting as '69% of women experience it' during orgasm

submitted by [deleted] from (dailystar.co.uk)

all 48 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Canbot 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

Women don't ejaculate. For some reason the (((porn industry))) has really started pushing scat. They are trying to sneak it in by passing off pissing as the female orgasm. It is not. Most women absolutely do not piss themselves during sex.

The claim that "hur dur if you disagree it's because you can't bring a girl to orgasm." Is the standard propaganda to shoot down anyone pushing back against this agenda.

Don't normalize scat. Don't try to sound smart by passing along this bullshit in casual conversation. If your girl is pissing on you during sex have her go to the toilet before or urologist in the morning.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

Natural lubricant's can be forced through the ducts from the Barthoin's glands in a manner similar to ejaculation, or tear duct gleeking. This can occur during climaxel contractions, when the female body increases outflow of mucus, or from direct simulation by hand. Under normal circumstances, it is only noticeable as a slight moistening during intercourse, a few drops of airborne moisture or hair thin ejection, and almost never in quantities large enough to be caught on camera. This is often faked in pornographic films with either artificial lubricants, or urine to create an unnatural 'squirting' effect.

Everything involved in this topic is obfuscation, meant to confuse the simple concept of the vagina becoming moist during orgasm. Which is exactly how every aspect of society is subverted. It is done through partial truths meant to make everyone involved feel and think that they are correct. Proͣ̃ͮ̈̔ͦͯve me wrong.

Ĥ̅͛ǝ̮̺͕̲̰llo ʍoɹlp' I,m Qnǝsʇᴉouɐqlǝ.̬̘̟ͅ

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Lubricant does not squirt. You are trying to lend credibility to the bullshit squirting narrative by invoking a completely different bodily function.

Squirting refers specifically to pissing. It has nothing to do with lubrication which happens slowly during arousal, not climax.

You are full of shit.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Lubricant does not squirt. You are trying to lend credibility to the bullshit squirting narrative by invoking a completely different bodily function. Squirting refers specifically to pissing.

Strange, I specifically spent 45 minutes crafting a reply that did not do that. Where as you put up a strawman in your second paragraph:

The claim that "hur dur if you disagree it's because you can't bring a girl to orgasm." Is the standard propaganda to shoot down anyone pushing back against this agenda.

Next up we have???

Squirting refers specifically to pissing.

OK. And how is that different from what I said here:

This is often faked in pornographic films with either artificial lubricants, or urine to create an unnatural 'squirting' effect.

Lets review a couple more statements shall we? Here is you:

You are trying to lend credibility to the bullshit squirting narrative by invoking a completely different bodily function.

Here is me:

Everything involved in this topic is obfuscation, meant to confuse the simple concept of the vagina becoming moist during orgasm. Which is exactly how every aspect of society is subverted. It is done through partial truths meant to make everyone involved feel and think that they are correct. Prove me wrong.

Comprehension is a bitch ain't it?

Now lets try and figure out why you, an Admin have allowed this thread, and u/HongKongPhooey to be allowed to remain here on saiddit. You see, I'm just one of the people who reported this porn based submission for removal. Where as you are the Admin who refused to take it down. Who's lending credibility to what now? Please, feel free to explain that to me in detail. I am rather slow after all.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Strange, I specifically spent 45 minutes crafting a reply that did not do that.

If it was your intent to not conflate natural lubricants with "squirting" then you failed. But I'm glad that we agree that they are completely different things and that the existence of natural bodily functions does not support the "squirting is natural" narrative.

Where as you are the Admin who refused to take it down. Who's lending credibility to what now?

This shouldn't need to be said but here it is: the content posted on this website does not represent the opinions of owners, administrators, contractors, sponsors, janitors, maintenance crews, or any employees, relatives or acquaintances of those listed.

It is not an endorsement to not remove content or comments. There is rightfully a high bar set for the removal of posts or comments.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

If you insist. But I don't think we need ball fondling on the front page. Dildo washing, squirting articles, or any of the rest of this shite that falls just short of porn. Are we boiling a frog here?

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The frog was boiled long ago. Nothing left but mush.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

A better solution is to promote better content through community participation in the new tab.

A more immediate solution is for users to block the propagandists in thier own options.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Yes, I can block peoples accounts until I exist in an echo chamber of my own creation. But as an Admin, you will need to have some standards for the community. Or you can just let that frog boil.

Please consider the following. Forums are public spaces, and the definition of Porn, is something unfit for public consumption.

For me on the other hand, posting a promo code for lowered mining fees has gotten my posts deleted because of the mere potential that I might profit literal pennies. And likewise, I can link to an article, where the author posts a promo code, and gets hundreds of dollars because, it will be viewed as a legitimate website, and not self promoting. Of course, unless I own that website, which you have no way of knowing about.

Yet, here is a post that you claim to be morally apposed to on your website? On a topic you believe will destroy society? And it isn't even a debate format, but an outgoing link to a for profit website pushing this agenda.

[A]? Do you have a set moral limit?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I don't consider it a matter of morality at all. It is a matter of principle to allow content you disagree with to the greatest extent possible, with as much consistency as possible when the foundation of the website is free speech. My role here is simply to take some of the load off of the people who run this website. My participation is in appreciation of free speech. So it is my intent to live up to that principle when deciding what I will remove.

Furthermore I think the proper way to treat propaganda is to debate it, not censor it. That is the way to keep it from destroying society.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

And if this were a matter of creative writing, that would be fine. But things that sound good when read, are irrelevant.

https://wikidiff.com/principle/morality

How does one fight a propaganda war when language/morality has been subverted?

What does an admin do if not control?

What's the difference between a language and a program language?

I asked you if you had a moral limit. And I received no answer.

I continue to ask if we are boiling a frog here. You refuse to acknowledge the concept.

I subvert the very concept of debate. You think it is debatable.

You post opinion from an Admin account, while claiming neutrality.

I'm sorry. All I see is traction, and tools that can be used against you.

Propaganda is never in good faith. You can not debate bad faith. Especially not in a digital format.

All tools can be used against their creators.

Now do your best to not fall on your own sword.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

yes, and p.s. the science has been done and 'squirting' is pee.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Nope.

If you read the studies they purposely ask for women who produce large amounts of liquid which means they are selecting for the women who pee and excluding the women who have the normal small amount of white, greasy ejaculate.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

cope

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No, but they sometimes piss the bed during sex

    [–]alladd 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    lmao bro there is not a coordinated agenda to make up a bodily function, touch grass

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Females don't ejaculate. Get a biology book. Become a little less ignorant.

    [–]alladd 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    some do and a biology book that covers such topics would say so.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Incontinence is not normal. That it happens doesn't make it normal.

    [–]alladd 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    look sources: https://www.issm.info/sexual-health-qa/do-women-ejaculate

    read a book bro

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Can the author define what a woman is without using the word woman? 🤔

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Get some experience with the ladies and you'll change your ignorant mind.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Get your girl some diapers, and stop trying to cope with nonsense.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Many girls.

    Keep your dream alive if you must, but it flies in the face of experience, evidence, countless testimonies, and biological functions, "normal" or not, hygienic or not.

    [–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Actually, having them pee after sex will dramatically reduce infections in the urinal tract.

    Just, you know, in a toilet.

    [–]jingles 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Scat typically refers to using poo as a lubricant and it can also be eaten as a snack.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Fact: Most girls don't squirt much. Some squirt a little. And some squirt a lot.

    They all don't have fake reasons to stage it into an ordeal, having to get towels, etc etc etc - all inconveniences, just to get off. None of the squirters I've met, gushers or not, had reason to lie.

    I can't speak to whether it was lube or piss or what, or why it happens - I just know it happens, to different kinds of people.

    Squirters on video may be an entirely different story.

    [–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

    97% of the people on Saidit are shocked to learn that women can orgasm. And 50% of them think that they shouldn't be allowed to.

    [–]Chipit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    They don't have the thundering ejaculatory orgasms that men have. They also don't ejaculate. It's physically impossible. The "squirt" is loss of bladder control. It's urine.

    Next time you watch a porno with this (eww gross) you'll notice it comes out of the pee hole.

    [–]jet199Instigatrix 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Nope. It's natural lubrication. The gushing water which is faked in porn is nothing like actual female ejaculation.

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    It's not faked, it's urine. Watch it come out of the pee hole.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Step away from a computer screen, and watch it in person for a very different authentic experience.

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Women are physically incapable of ejaculating. They do not have a prostate gland.

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    If it's necessary, how is it that you ejaculate absurdities through your keyboard?

    [–]Chipit 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    DOH HO HO HO HO HO

    [–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They don't have the thundering ejaculatory orgasms that men have. They also don't ejaculate. It's physically impossible.

    https://www.jsm.jsexmed.org/article/S1743-6095(15)33346-4/fulltext

    "we provided new biochemical evidences demonstrating that the clear and abundant fluid that is ejected in gushes (squirting) is different from the real female ejaculation. While the first has the features of diluted urines (density: 1,001.67 ± 2.89; urea: 417.0 ± 42.88 mg/dL; creatinine: 21.37 ± 4.16 mg/dL; uric acid: 10.37 ± 1.48 mg/dL), the second is biochemically comparable to some components of male semen (prostate‐specific antigen: 3.99 ± 0.60 × 103 ng/mL)."

    [–]package 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    Sounds like someone is in denial about getting peed on

    [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    That's a whole other story, and it's not as bad as it sounds, nor as interesting, nor a good idea.

    Try anything once or twice, but also know when to quit.

    [–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The high-volume, high-pressure "squirting" you see in porn is mostly watered down urine. Watersports aren't my thing, but if nobody is harmed by it, who am I to judge other people's kinks?

    On the other hand, female ejaculation is provable not urine, it is similar to the fluid released by the male prostate. In females that would be Skene’s glands which are found in the vagina.

    [–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Bro no one is saying women can't cum. There is no amount of squirting, high or low pressure, that isn't piss. If you have experienced any amount of liquid during sex that isn't primarily contained within the vagina you have been peed upon and brought great shame to your family.

    [–]Gaslov 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    You'd probably do better taking this kind of content to reddit. It'll be better received by gullible virgins.

    [–]noshore4me 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    As opposed to the oh-so-savvy virgins that are crawling around this site?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Who are you calling a virgin, I felt a boob once.

    [–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    69%, you say? How coincidental.

    [–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    97% of saiditors should know that I do not need any instructions manual to figure out how to make my penis squirt.

    If I scrub it with a wire brush, it does it.