Biological clocks tick louder as women age, regardless of how "success and empowerment" during the prime childbearing years.

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (totalprosports.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Definitely too late for her. Unless she pulls a miracle. But what has she got to offer. Men don’t care how successful a woman is in terms of her career or her sports. Furthermore, a growing number of men are realising that the family court system in a lot of western countries screw men over when it comes to alimony, child support and child custody. So a growing number of men across the west don’t want to get married. And a growing number of western men who are still open to the idea of getting married are raising their standards for what kind of women they’re willing to marry. And men prefer women when they are at peak fertility, with women in their 20’s in the highest demand.

[–]gloomy_bear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree, and women are at peak fertility in their 20's and 30's. 40's is way too late.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My grandmother did have her youngest child in her mid-40's. However, she was in her mid-20's when she had her eldest child, and she’s had lots of children. 40’s is definitely too late for having your first child.