all 17 comments

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    They want to ruin his rep so if you say anything in the future he happened to say, they can discredit you with no evidence or effort involved.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Soloninja 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Did he ever

      [–]RedEyedWarrior 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      He used to. Even liberals liked him. Then he supported Trump in 2016. That’s when liberals turned on him.

      [–]Insider 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      they're just a part of the psyop, as written by the US army

      https://archive.org/stream/from-psyop-to-mind-war-the-psychology-of-victory/From%20PSYOP%20to%20MindWar%3A%20The%20Psychology%20of%20Victory%20-%20by%20Colonel%20Paul%20E.%20Valley%20%28Commander%29%20-%20with%20-%20Major%20Michael%20A.%20Aquino%20%28PSYOP%20Research%20%26%20Analysis%20Team%20Leader%29_djvu.txt

      the MindWar operative must know that he speaks the truth, and he must be personally committed to it. What he says is only a part of MindWar; the rest - and the test of its effectiveness - lies in the conviction he projects to his audience, in the rapport he establishes with it.

      Why does one believe one television newsman more than another, even though both may report the same headlines? The answer is that there is rapport in the former case; and it is a rapport which has been recognized and cultivated by the most successful broadcasters.

      [–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      hahahah $$$

      [–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      Sandy Hook Shooting did not happen, it was a hoax.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      that's a pretty extreme position to take

      [–]raven9[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      If you examine the evidence it was not at all extreme to believe it was faked. Not least for the lack of police presence. I watched the helicopter footage. You would see more cops at a gas station robbery than were present at that school after the supposed mass shooting.

      There were no cops controlling traffic and the only road access to the school was completely blocked by random cars just parked in the road.

      No bodies were ever seen being removed from the school.

      No one ever saw where did the other 500 children go that were supposed to have in the school at the time.

      No one ever saw people who were family and friends of the victims posting on social media about it.

      No one has posted any cell phone pictures or videos of the events that day.

      Helicopter footage of weird procession of people circulating round and around through the firehouse building looked like it was staged to make it look like there was more people in chaos than there really was and only a handful of children were visable there.

      Photoshopped pictures of faked victim family groupings.

      A large number of the victims parents were from out of state.

      ...and that is just the tip of the iceberg.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Hoax means no kids were murdered. Maybe that's true, or maybe the dude running through the forest whacked the kids.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It did not happen.

      It was a hoax.

      [–]raven9[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      This should go down as one of the top court room comebacks of all time!

      [–]Soloninja 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      What a god damn legendary come back

      [–]JoGooD 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      So... is Alex Jones actually Bill Hicks? Are they making this trial to claim that Alex Jones is a real person and not a character?

      [–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      he's not Bill Hicks, seems like that was fake news

      [–]JoGooD 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Any proof of that? It does really look like he his