There's just so much nonsense here.

First of all, behind the faux legitimacy (pff) offered by Tucker Carlson's "news" outlet, behind the faux legitimacy of the claimed capital police memo, what we have here is an unsubstantiated tweet by somebody named Paul Sperry.

Paul has been pretty clear in the past that no such conspiracy happened

https://mobile.twitter.com/PaulSperry30/status/1542591800053010434

I don't know why Tucker Carlson decided to report on one tweet and not the other.

If you think a tweet from somebody called Paul is good enough evidence for something like this, then your head is more fucked up than I realised.

Other proof offered in Tucker Carlson's blog's article is that a "former FBI agent" who was on capitol grounds protesting that day, thinks he saw bus loads of antifa arriving. What's the source on that statement? It's the guy Paul's twitter again.

Not sufficient evidence for such a statement. It's just unsubstantiated tweets from some guy. Who also tweets saying the opposite.

I'm not a bad person because I demand extraordinary proof for extraordinary claims. There's something legitimately wrong with your brain and it's fascinating to watch you have a break down on a conspiracy message board.