January 6th was NOT an insurrection. Calling it that makes you a liar and immoral. You are a bad person if you perpetuate a lie.

submitted by [deleted] from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (40 children)

Point to a single paid agitator, let alone 50. You can't. Because they don't exist. Yet we have 1000s of sweaty old pasty maga fuckheads who very much exist, very much invaded the capital and very much were engaged in a plot to prevent the peaceful transfer of power in America - namely treason

[–][deleted]  (39 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (38 children)

    The guy who ran security said there were paid people ther

    Link to it. Ran security for who? Capital metro police? Link to what you mean because you're relying on their word. You're trying to convince me by saying some unnamed nebulous unspecified security guy thought so. Why do you think that would convince anyone? You're literally as bad as infowars and fox news

    [–][deleted]  (37 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (36 children)

      Your attempted insult is the clear last resort of a loser.

      You're literally incapable of pointing to a single paid actor, because no such person exists.

      On the other hand, Brian Albrecht was an admitted seditionists, Joshua James was an admitted seditionist, Stuart Rhodes was an admitted seditionist, Enrique Tarrio was an admitted seditionist, Ashli Babbit was an admitted seditionist, ..... Hundreds and even thousands of morons who proudly proclaimed, they were in town to violently stop the vote...

      [–][deleted]  (13 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

        Doubt it

        It should be really easy for you to ISOLATE and DEBUNK a single lie I've told, shouldn't it. Not sure why you're having such a hard time.

        Oh, no, the baby on the internet thinks I'm a bad man because I won't agree with it that 2+2=5 oh no. You're a child and I'm having no fun grooming you

        [–][deleted]  (11 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

          Point to a single lie I told...I'll wait

          [–][deleted]  (20 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

            There's just so much nonsense here.

            First of all, behind the faux legitimacy (pff) offered by Tucker Carlson's "news" outlet, behind the faux legitimacy of the claimed capital police memo, what we have here is an unsubstantiated tweet by somebody named Paul Sperry.

            Paul has been pretty clear in the past that no such conspiracy happened

            https://mobile.twitter.com/PaulSperry30/status/1542591800053010434

            I don't know why Tucker Carlson decided to report on one tweet and not the other.

            If you think a tweet from somebody called Paul is good enough evidence for something like this, then your head is more fucked up than I realised.

            Other proof offered in Tucker Carlson's blog's article is that a "former FBI agent" who was on capitol grounds protesting that day, thinks he saw bus loads of antifa arriving. What's the source on that statement? It's the guy Paul's twitter again.

            Not sufficient evidence for such a statement. It's just unsubstantiated tweets from some guy. Who also tweets saying the opposite.

            I'm not a bad person because I demand extraordinary proof for extraordinary claims. There's something legitimately wrong with your brain and it's fascinating to watch you have a break down on a conspiracy message board.

            [–][deleted]  (18 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

              Bruh here is the source for the article which you linked. Don't get mad at me because your sourcing is so bad.

              https://mobile.twitter.com/PaulSperry30/status/1542961119932866566

              I am genuinely curious - when you see that, do you wonder who Paul is? Do you wonder how he got this memo? Are you curious about who sent this warning - could it even have been Paul himself?

              The totality of your evidence is that some guy called Paul is aware of an email sent by someone to capital police.

              Don't get mad at me because your information processing abilities are so terrible

              Edit - and you said to me

              It’s your fault you remain ignorant.

              Lol!

              [–][deleted]  (16 children)

              [deleted]