How can it elude the top minds of academia that the purpose of sex is reproduction?

submitted by [deleted] from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199Instigatrix 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

This is a very strange strawman.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

How is this a strawman? OP explicity states that any sex for pleasure and not reproduction is deviant, and comparable to a mental illness like an eating disorder. This would apply to anyone even practicing birth control. Wore a condom? Deviant. Birth control pills? You are mentally ill

How can it elude the top minds of academia that the purpose of sex is reproduction?

Any behavior that contradicts this purpose is logically dysfunctional, akin to eating for pleasure alone.

I am directly addressing the claim in question here - that there is something inherently wrong with having sex when reproduction isn't the motivation for it. I don't see how you can say this is strawman fallacy

[–]jet199Instigatrix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is eating for pleasure alone deviant now?

You are arguing with yourself.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is eating for pleasure alone deviant now?

Yes that is literally what OP said, here it is AGAIN.

Any behavior that contradicts this purpose is logically dysfunctional, akin to eating for pleasure alone.

He literally says its a dysfunction

You are arguing with yourself.

No, your just don't know how to read, or are severely mentally defective