Overtaking with a steam engine

submitted by Anman from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

Of course. This is the same as the first car from Mister Benz. Guess what: It was electric.

[–]Anman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

The time to capatalise on electric cars has come. He was ahead of his time. A visionary. He's dead.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

The problem Mr. Musk has is though that he is so fucking greedy that he only sells bs. Lies basically. The "principle hope" with a price tag.

Because he can't code (look at Tesla defect ssd because of a daemon they couldn't get under control), he can't be fair (look at how he treats his employees), he is a hippocrite (look at how he impregnated Grimes) and he has the wrong concept of the relation between power and responsibility (look at all the bs he is pulling with twitter, e.g.).

His problem is his inner emptiness. That is why any satisfaction he can feel only can come from the outside and he actually collects money to "force" being a person he simply ain't.

This problem actually is simple and he shares it with a lot of psychopaths and assholes. Basically with all his fake-ass "friends" (hippocrites) smart people, i call these guys, what they actually are:

paypal-mafia. Because these mofos turned our internet into a fucking shopping mall.

See: There is a difference between an actual value and a price tag.

Which already is a lie the moment it is printed. Just for itself.

[–]Anman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Musks history = fraud. No question there.

However I take offence to the psychopath part. Psychopaths have an important role to play in society and just like anyone else, they come in different forms and are fully capable of learning right from wrong. The best anti islam youtube guy is a diagnosed psychopath who learned from his mistakes. Anyway, i take offence because I adopt many psychopathic tendencies to make my life easier. Actually, I'm not really offended. It's just rolls off the tongue to say so. Also I reckon on a subconscious level it makes people feel important to highlight they are offended. maybe.

The official numbers are something around 60% of the electric cars being tesla in Australia, but I see more of the other brands where I live and I am not in a major city.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Yeah. We're possible more equal in this part than i'd like to admit. My therapist says i got a "brain 2.0" .

But i got some core values and concepts that keep me "sane". Also i'm an idealist because if i wanna make money, i just do it. There is absolutely no fear inside me. Which is a gift. So i developed a spine. That is why i got no shell that can break.

Trauma also never was a problem for me, obviously. And i'm vindictive. I can keep a grudge for a long time and then hit back when the respectlessness or "attack" that actually hit sme inside me is down the memory hole for the sheep that did it to me.

But since i almost perfected (actually converge to) compartmentalization and tactical behavior there is nothing to see here that can be hit inside me.

Sheeple attacking me personally mostly only hit thin air. And then i mirror their own defects. But i'm getting more reasonable with all the energy i still have.

[–]Anman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Sounds more like a perfected introversion to me. Which nothing wrong with it, I'm an introvert and can understand. I spend a lot of time talking about the differences with my extroverted associates and it sounds like they are easily more offended by everything by default, regardless if it is directed to them or not. There are positive reasons for this, but not relevant here.

But... Would you kill a man?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Maybe. I'm also very flexible in applying ethical concepts. There is an old German proverb that goes like this:

"Laws are for people who cannot behave".

I live by a strict codex. And i don't like inconsistence and inconsequence as attributes or character traits anyway. So if it was personal and i had consistent and verified evidence... Yeah. Possibly i would.

This never occurred to me, because i never needed to actually think about it. Most people are numb enough to contradict or rebut themselves sooner or later, so i never "felt" the need to. It rather has been a question of patience for me so far.

But if i would do smth. like this, it of course would follow a strict plan. Not from impulse or emotions. So it definitely would be homicide not manslaughter. And i possibly would spend a lot of energy into the plan to secure multiple tactical options and make very sure, i wouldn't get caught.

[–]Anman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Very good, the logical introvert. However I do not believe you mean this:

I'm also very flexible in applying ethical concepts.

Sounds like your morals are grounded, thus any application of ethics is logical and/ors that lead to yes or no. I might be wrong, you could be talking out of your ass, true moral groundness can really only be found in predetermine rules, such as in the christian bible. But fanaticism to ideals, such as codes like bushido or a guild doctrine also can work.

Maybe, tiny chance, we could be friends. But there are no friends on the internet.

Further food. When someone says something that contradicts your morals, you might say "I would rather die than follow" that. But would you say "I would rather kill than follow that".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Well, Sung Tzu teaches that attack always is costly and the goal of every fight or war is peace, at last. Which is a mostly forgotten fact for me.

I'm doing very well in my life so far by thinking defensive first, first and first. Then letting people around me pull off their bs. The laughs they produce with this kind of self-contradiction are always free and sometimes even interesting. I don't know, if i'd ever actually attack sme at all. Because this could be very costly, not even only the risk but also the mental energy that has to go in an attack plan that has a chance to succeed.

This concept i implemented is rather an energy concept than a moral one.

[–]Anman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

The problem I have with Sung Tzu is that he is often used in business tactics also. It is common in the high power managerial world to be referenced. But business and war do not apply to morals. For example, here where I live, you either take an experimental injection, or lose your job. Many many people took the injection, because they couldn't afford to lose their jobs, posting pictures of them taking it with signs saying "I was coerced" and the like. They didn't attack anything at all and lost the entire moral battle. Those of us that lost our jobs, won the moral battle. But both are victories and both are loses, but which one will triumph in the long run?

I am a big fan of defence, as I am societal isolationist, but you can not win any fight if you're only blocking. A fort is useless unless you can attack from it.

This concept i implemented is rather an energy concept

Dont be lazy.