Scientists don't understand what they're seeing and the official explanation of the universe has yet another hole poked in it, Hubble Telescope observation flavor

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (hubblesite.org)

all 9 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

There is far more evidence that redshift is not purely velocity based. Interstellar plasma lasma causes a redshift. We can see it in the laboratories. It depends on the amount of free electrons and some other factors.

We also know that certain "high-redshift" objects are in front of "low-redshift" objects. Usually quasars. And we see no time-delation in pulsars.

The problem is that astronomers do not want to do research into it. There is likely no expansion at all. Everything was mainly based on outdated theoretical models.

The cosmic background radiation is also falling apart, because the signal disappears outside the earth's influence. Instead we see radiation from point sources and the milkyway.

And there are far away complex galaxies that are extremely old. Note that galaxies are not collapsing. We see the oldest stars on the outside and not on the inside. New stars are formed along spirals and not via collisions. So the whole stellar evolution theory is wrong.

Have a sub /s/plasmacosmology where I list these problems.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

/s/plasmacosmology

What is plasmacosm?

[–]zyxzevn🐈‍⬛ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Current astronomy ignores most of the plasma in the universe, yet plasma radiates most of the light.

Astronomy with plasma physics = plasma cosmology

Plasma reacts to electric and magnetic fields. Here is a demonstration of a plasma loop on the sun:
Fiery loop rain on the sun

The moving plasma is moving because of electrical fields. This causes the ions and electrons to move from one side to the other. Opposite polarized particles (ions and electrons) move in different directions, and when they collide, they become neutral. And that is what causes the rain.

The youtube channel SkyScholar goes into:
chemical reactions that happen on the sun
Is the corona at millions of degrees?

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Holy fucking shit!

;-)

[–]TooMuchClay 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's a great sub

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Christians can point and laugh. The basic premise of the paradigm is false and they're head-scratching trying to figure out how the numbers don't work out? womp womp

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I think convoluted articles often result when people who don't understand what is going on try to sound as if they do

    [–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    or it happens when talking about bullshit that is literally nonsense and they are trying to explain why it isn't bullshit, but in so doing they continue to sound like bullshit, but they say it with such authority that fools think it must be something they are missing.

    nope. entirely, functionally, fundamentally, and completely.. retarded

    space is a lie

    the FOUNDER OF NASA had a quote about the firmament put onto his grave.

    [–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm not an expert but the theory of a local void + MOND creating the illusion of acceleration seems far more reasonable than dark matter, especially when there's apparently such obscene amounts of it everywhere yet absolutely none of it anywhere within reach.