Where are all the lawsuits against all the medical malpractice in the last 2 years?

submitted by magnora7 from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The vaccine makers were given blanket immunity under EUA. Nobody can get standing to sue. This sits at the foundation of the crime that is being committed.

For those thinking Trump is a savior, please note that this concept of blanket immunity is adhered to across all political lines. Those running the show are all in complete agreement on this subject. Trump as much as everyone in the "establishment" he pretends he isn't a part of. Hint: he is.

Edit to add: Two more points occur to me. First, the medical community has also drunk the Kool-aid on this. As such, when people sue, lawyers usually use their "pet doctors" to demonstrate that the person being sued did not follow standard medical practice. When they are all following the same damaging practices, the suit becomes impossible, because you need to show that "a good doctor wouldn't do that", but almost all doctors are doing it. Who do you use to show the practice is damaging if other doctors won't testify to that?

Second, perhaps the very people who are so likely to generate the lawsuits we're so used to seeing are also the most likely to be buying into the insanity we are witnessing. This one is just a hunch and may not be at all borne out in practice, but just a thought.

[–]magnora7[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

The vaccine makers were given blanket immunity under EUA. Nobody can get standing to sue

Yes but they can still sue the government for approving it and enforcing mandates, sue the employers for enforcing mandates, sue the doctors who pushed it hard without giving informed consent to their patients, sue the media who was stifling information contradictory to pharma narratives.

And plus this EUA is just a piece of paper. It doesn't grant them immunity from lawsuits if they've committed a crime against humanity.

because you need to show that "a good doctor wouldn't do that", but almost all doctors are doing it.

And the ones who didn't were fired by corrupt hospitals, some even for just speaking out against the widespread use of this highly-experimental technology.

Second, perhaps the very people who are so likely to generate the lawsuits we're so used to seeing are also the most likely to be buying into the insanity we are witnessing.

Perhaps, but lawyers are known for going against the grain quite often, so there's got to be lawyers out there itching to try out these lawsuits. Especially once it's proven it's possible to get money from this approach. I think perhaps that's the actual thing that's causing a wait, it's not yet been proven a profitable avenue for lawyers. Once it is, then I imagine the floodgates will open.

You know all those "Have you been injured by x medicine?" ads lawyers have on tv? Imagine that times a thousand.

[–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

PREP act.