The tragic consequences of living the feminist dream.

submitted by Canbot from files.catbox.moe

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]jet199Instigatrix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Meh, during the whole of my twenties I met one single guy in his twenties who actively wanted to get married and settle down, and her was a serial cheater on his poor fiancee.

It's dumb to blame feminism for women not starting families when there are zero men around to start them with. Of course they are going to look to become financially secure themselves in that situation so they can start a family alone if necessary.

Sad times.

[–]Canbot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's not about blaming women. It is about waking them up to reality. The first step is for women to stop sleeping around with guys who don't want to commit to them. Sure, men are the second half of that problem but they don't suffer any of the consequences. What do you wake men up to? The fact that they can fuck all thier 20s away and marry a younger girl later? They know. The women don't know how precious and limited thier time is. It's not fair, it's reality.

The problem is that feminism fights that reality. It hides it. It attacks those who would counsel girls to be conservative. Being conservative is what will save them from the spinster fate. But the left simply mocks words like spinster. They have conditioned girls to reject these warnings without any thought.

Conservative girls do find husbands in thier 20s. The reality is that something like 20 percent of guys are fucking all the loose women. Those 20 percent of guy aren't going to change but the other 80% are out there. Just not at the clubs. Not at the house parties. Not approaching women in public any more because they are calles creeps for it.

If there were more women who were conservative there would be more places for marriage quality guys to find them. If there were fewer loose girls there would be a higher incentive for marriage.

The solution is so simple and it is entirely in the hands of girls. No sex before marriage. The only reason most girls find that so appalling is because of leftist indoctrination.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Young people are literally having less sex than ever before.

Step out of your porn filled fantasy of what women are and into the real world occasionally.

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A decrease in sex from all time highs is meaningless. And it is not the amount of sex, it is the lifestyle.

Jordan Peterson has a lifetime of practicing psychology from which he speaks. This is no one's fantasy.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe take a look at societies were there is nearly no sex before marriage like Islamic countries.

Men can't access women so they groom little boys for sex instead.

The idea that men controlling themselves is entirely in the hands of women is dangerous nonsense. If there is no pressure on men in society to control themselves then lack of available loose women soon turns to abuse and rape of the vulnerable.

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think you are desperately reaching for any way to spin monogamy as a bad thing. I find your claim that it is monogamy that has lead them to sexual abuse to be dubious. White populations, like Mormons, who practice monogamy do not have sexual abuse problems. In fact in the US the worst sexual abuse of children comes from Hollywood elite, and they are as sexually permiscuous as you can get.

What thier monogamy has lead them to, the thing which is different from permiscuous society, is healthy birth rates, single parent employment, and non spinsters.

The last point being the only relevant one to this conversation.

[–]Cornfed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It is because of feminism that men can't or don't want to get married. Of course it is more the evil regime than females that are behind feminism.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Explain your working.

Because in Victorian times a man could be punished if his wife committed a crime and it didn't stop anyone getting married.

That's the reality of old fashioned, pre-feminist male responsibility.

[–]Cornfed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes but as with children you could punish your wife for misbehavior and society would also punish her.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not from a prison cell you couldn't.

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am no more interested in the mating habits of modern scum than I am of sewer rats.