What is your most controversial opinion?

submitted by [deleted] from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (8 children)

I have mentioned women shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's bound to be unpopular with over half of everyone. I mean maybe not here...

I also belief things would have been better if we did nothing with the pandemic. Just ignored it. And also if it killed way more people. It would be painful but there'd be a lot of opportunities for the survivors.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

But the virus would mutate and kill everything except the squirrels. 2000 years from now, the squirrels will mutate, wear leather outfits and form republican governments. At about that time, Russian cosmonauts' descendents in the International Space Station will return, and will be enslaved by the squirrels. You really don't want that....

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's nuts.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The shitty vax is wht causes mutations. If everyone just got the bug they would have broad spectrum immunity and mutation would be far less likely.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No - we're way beyond this very old propaganda lie by now. (Even anti-vax people know that viruses mutate when they are allowed to spread, due especially to a lack of antibodies. Increase the antibodies - with or without the vaccine - in everyone and the virus won't spread and mutate. Virology 101.)

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That is incorrect. Allowing natural infections would provide broad spectrum protection and prevent mutant strains from infecting those with antibodies. The jab provides very limited protection for only 1 spike protein, which is the part that mutates the fastest. This creates a very fertile ground for any mutant strain to rampage across.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No - you're obviously getting this from propaganda websites, rather than medical science. It's wrong. Allowing natural infections allows the virus to cause significant damage to many of those who've had it, killing a small portion of them, and allows the virus to spread and mutate. This happened - for example in India, where the Delta variant developed.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think everyone here already knows you are the propagandist. But just for the record, what you are saying is illogical and incorrect.

"Causing damage" does not make a virus mutate. So your claim that this is the mechanism by which natural infections cause mutations is absurd.

killing a small portion of them, and allows the virus to spread and mutate

1.Killing is not how viruses spread. 2.the vax does not stop spread 3.natural immunity DOES stop spread 4.the vax kills and causes significant damage

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again - you're repeating right-wing misinformation and disinformation. You're being played by the 1% to push their anti-vax agenda amongs idiots who will beliieve them. You don't have to believe me. Look at the medical science. Find one scientific article that repeats your claims. What you note is NOT scientific. Anti-vax dumbasses are against the science of virology but are somehow experienced scientists themselves (though with absolutely no training). Assess the facts. And stop attacking people you don't agree with. You might learn something.