What is your most controversial opinion?

submitted by [deleted] from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (31 children)

I have mentioned women shouldn't be allowed to vote. That's bound to be unpopular with over half of everyone. I mean maybe not here...

I also belief things would have been better if we did nothing with the pandemic. Just ignored it. And also if it killed way more people. It would be painful but there'd be a lot of opportunities for the survivors.

[–]mahavishnunj 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I have mentioned women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I also belief things would have been better

Should people who cannot spell be allowed to vote?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

yeah spelling isn't that important, it's a sign of a weak mind when someone focuses on it

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

it's a sign of a weak mind

lol, again the irony!

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

But the virus would mutate and kill everything except the squirrels. 2000 years from now, the squirrels will mutate, wear leather outfits and form republican governments. At about that time, Russian cosmonauts' descendents in the International Space Station will return, and will be enslaved by the squirrels. You really don't want that....

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's nuts.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The shitty vax is wht causes mutations. If everyone just got the bug they would have broad spectrum immunity and mutation would be far less likely.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No - we're way beyond this very old propaganda lie by now. (Even anti-vax people know that viruses mutate when they are allowed to spread, due especially to a lack of antibodies. Increase the antibodies - with or without the vaccine - in everyone and the virus won't spread and mutate. Virology 101.)

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That is incorrect. Allowing natural infections would provide broad spectrum protection and prevent mutant strains from infecting those with antibodies. The jab provides very limited protection for only 1 spike protein, which is the part that mutates the fastest. This creates a very fertile ground for any mutant strain to rampage across.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No - you're obviously getting this from propaganda websites, rather than medical science. It's wrong. Allowing natural infections allows the virus to cause significant damage to many of those who've had it, killing a small portion of them, and allows the virus to spread and mutate. This happened - for example in India, where the Delta variant developed.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think everyone here already knows you are the propagandist. But just for the record, what you are saying is illogical and incorrect.

"Causing damage" does not make a virus mutate. So your claim that this is the mechanism by which natural infections cause mutations is absurd.

killing a small portion of them, and allows the virus to spread and mutate

1.Killing is not how viruses spread. 2.the vax does not stop spread 3.natural immunity DOES stop spread 4.the vax kills and causes significant damage

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again - you're repeating right-wing misinformation and disinformation. You're being played by the 1% to push their anti-vax agenda amongs idiots who will beliieve them. You don't have to believe me. Look at the medical science. Find one scientific article that repeats your claims. What you note is NOT scientific. Anti-vax dumbasses are against the science of virology but are somehow experienced scientists themselves (though with absolutely no training). Assess the facts. And stop attacking people you don't agree with. You might learn something.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (18 children)

whats a brief rundown on why women shouldn't have the right to vote?

[–]blackpoop321 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Because they value security over freedom, by nature. It's actually a good thing but only in the confines of a family unit.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (16 children)

You'd cut down on the number of easily influenced, uninformed voters.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

Instead of ensuring a process where everyone, regardless of sex, is deeply informed on their political systems, the consequences, and their options, you would rather just remove an entire sex-based class because of why?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (7 children)

I don't know how you would politically educate a population in a neutral fashion. Our public education is slanted far left, we just shoehorn a mandatory far right class to balance things out? Don't you vote the way your husband wants anyways?

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

By offering objective information in a singular setting and not separating everyoneby political ideologies. Schools are meant to educate, not think for us.

Don't you vote the way your husband wants anyways?

If I agreed with him on political candidates and the policies they want to uphold. If not, no. Do you let your wife make decisions for you?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Do you let your wife make decisions for you?

Of course, we're a team. Let the things that are Caesars be Caesars.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Does she decide how you vote?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Of course not, voting is man stuff. Like killing bugs.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

And lo: his wife replaced him with a rumblier than usual washing mashine and a bottle of bug spray.

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know how you would politically educated a population in a neutral fashion.

Me neither. Do you know how we could educated a population to compose a coherent sentence? Good thing you're the one doing the voting!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, just noticed the typo.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

ensuring a process where everyone, regardless of sex, is deeply informed on their political systems

citizen 44323 reporting for re-education captain!

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Gonna need the Covid-24 vaccination metrics from your anal chip first, Sir.

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

Instead of ensuring a process where everyone, regardless of species, is deeply informed on their political systems, the consequences, and their options, you would rather just remove an entire species-based class because of why?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

https://youtu.be/QFgcqB8-AxE

Jokes aside, I don't understand your response. The only species that we collectively know of capable of examining our own political systems are humans.

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

The only sex that we collectively know of capable of examining our own political systems are men.

By the way, I agree with the guy in the video. Most men shouldn't vote either.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The only sex that we collectively know of capable of examining our own political systems are men.

We'll have to agree to disagree.

By the way, I agree with the guy in the video. Most men shouldn't vote either.

Probably not. People in general don't seem capable of doing anything other than seeking out the next dopamine boost anymore, at least in the West. The spark is missing from the grand majority, and at this point there's too many busted ass, broken souls to make any real beneficial societal changes anyway.

[–]mahavishnunj 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You'd cut down on the number of easily influenced, uninformed voters.

of course, males are NEVER easily influenced and uninformed, lol.