you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(2.)

/u/socks

To accomplish such a task, agents of this plan would have to “get rid of the constitutional shackles,” to prepare the vulgar mind for aristocratical ranks and titles. Should republican aversion prevent such a transition towards such rule, agents are not to “abandon the enterprise but lay up proposition in record, and in the legislature, drawing up bills, resolutions and reports,” and to keep in view that the limitations in the constitution are to be explained away. “Phrases and precedents may then be shuffled in and out,” to be adverted by candid or weak people and to allow the press during this period to propagate the doctrines of aristocracy and monarchy. “For this purpose,” according to the rules for changing a limited government into an unlimited hereditary one, “it will be particular useful to confound a mobish democracy with a representative republic.” In this period of transition, the agents of such a plan must “make known all the divisions, infighting, squabbles of past until the people tremble at their own shadows and convince them that a king [executive officer], who is always the enemy of the people, and a nobility, perhaps still more so, will take better care of the people than the people will take care of themselves.” That the grand nostrum will be public debt, indefinitely, and ever increasing, to “stretch it and swell it the utmost the items will bear” […] “…to make as perpetual as possible and to modify, complicate, divide, subdivide, subtract, postpone, etc., and it must never be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have deep stakes in the game. Properly composed, due members thereof can legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy” until the property falls into their hands. “The favorite few” […] “...their money will give them consequence and influence,” […] “…they will be the readiest materials for hereditary aristocratic order” and through them control will be maintained. The agents of this transformation will impose a “heavy taxes” which “will produce discontents,” so a “standing army will be created in proportion of this dissatisfaction.” Malcontents and dissidents against these agents of change must be suppressed and/or imprisoned.

What Freneau was able to delay well before 19th century reconstruction for a short time – that of mob democracy and hereditary monarchy, strangely beloved in today’s western world – and not withstanding the fact that Washington’s republic, dually for the courts, was merely another magisterial monstrosity that Samuel Adams ("Founder"), lover of Liberty, thought decent to shove through the "Riot Act,” (yesteryear’s Patriot Act) empowering Sheriff's to kill rioters in groups of 12 or more, proclaiming, that "[i]n monarchy the crime of treason may admit of being pardoned or lightly punished, but the man who dares rebel against the laws of a republic ought to suffer death” ; is the Hegelian divergence of competitive enterprise over the people. While many of the colonists fought in the revolution against the British, seeking sovereignty and allodial title for the decency to be left alone from all intrusions, taxes and foreign encroachments; the revolutionary continentalists, including autocrat George Washington, never had this in mind, exclaiming that “[m]ankind when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government.” – George Washington to Henry lee, Oct 31st 1786. In other words, the autonomous man is unfit to govern himself. And while the republic was incorporated by a body of mostly rich, slave-owning continentalists – neither mechanic or farmer, nor the working common folk had any say – for the property and protection of their assets and the few wealthy and powerful enough – mostly lawyers, land speculators and bankers – to consolidate; Washington appointed an abundance of monarchist sympathizers, like the Hebrew Alexander Hamilton (Levine), who established the executive branch, believing the carrying out of a permanent public debt to be the peoples’ blessing.

Concerning the transition of a limited government to a monarchist one, Frenaeu, who Washington wanted dead, explains that if the burden of permanent public debt cannot be preserved without uprising, a standing army must be imposed to quell such dissatisfaction. For a ‘better tomorrow’ by force was the diktat. Such a debt would require “the establishment of a great incorporated bank.” “If the constitution […] should not authorize it, [and it does not], “so much the better.” The schemers thus employ deceit to enact, exclaiming “push it through by a forced meaning and you get in the bargain an admirable precedent for future misconstructions.” In so erecting the bank, Frenaeu reminds us that the schemers were to always “remember that it is to be made particularly instrumental in enriching and aggrandizing the elect few...” Furthermore, rule number 10 of this strategy is especially interesting and peculiarly evocative of the left-right political psychodrama which is played out today. “Divide and govern is a maxim consecrated by the experience of ages, and should be familiar of its use by every politician as the knife he carries in his pocket.” When such progress in this transformation is dually made and accomplished, when the public mind is but a emulator of our cloak-and-dagger agenda and “the rules already laid down,” it will be necessary and “proper to venture […] toward a removal of the constitutional landmarks.” […] “It may be called,” observing present day rhetoric, “a power for the common safety or the public good, or, ‘the general welfare.” “It will not be so easily perceived that the premium bestowed may not be equal to the circuitous tax on consumption which pays it.” Rule 12: Proposes that the ‘external danger’ would be a politically expedient scheme to augment the need for a large standing military force. Rule 13: “[This] same prudence will improve the opportunity afforded by an increase of military expenditures for perpetuating the tax required for them.” The schemers confide that if this admitted inconsistency “and establishing of a perpetual tax for a temporary service produce any difficulty in their undertaking, rule 10,” that of divide and conquer, “must be resorted to.” Rule 14: “Throughout this great undertaking it will be wise to have some particular model constantly in view.” As a covert project, the schemers devised methods to stamp down suspicions and alarms, that they knew “were to be expected.” It is vital that “the people […] be kept asleep so as not to discover, or be thrown into artificial divisions so as not to resist, what is silently going forward.” Accordingly, the best general rule is “taking from the example of crying “stop thief.’” The modus operandi is thus this. “To charge every man who whispers, or even thinks that the revolution on foot is mediated,” neither pens nor lungs spared, “with being himself an enemy of the established government, and meaning to overturn it. Let the charge be reiterated and reverberated, until at last such confusion and uncertainty be produced, that the people being not able to find out where the truth lies, withdraw their attention from the contest.” Is it any different today? “Long live the queen,” exclaims Joe Biden. This is what Freneau was to delay but unfortunately the people ignorantly clamored towards the rule of the few.
The proponents of limited government and a free and autonomous man, though Jefferson spoke only with his lips, Freneau, a French illuminate, was able to inform public perception and postpone what would be enacted 150 years ago with the assassination of Lincoln and the bankers reconstruction policy.

A group of persons said it owned everything and the mob did what it said, and not the other way around… that led to the industrial revolution and those industrialists who worked the people to the bone for their own private gains. The 4th industrial revolution is now upon us, will you go along with it or turn your back towards it? Because what they have in store for us, if you so chose to play, is human capital of bestial gamification – capital under a new, more Orwellian and intrusive system..