you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

/r/againsthatesubreddits.

Notorious thugs who post cheese pizza to subreddits they don't like and then report them to the admins to get them deleted. It works despite the admins knowing full well who they are and how they operate. They break all of reddit's rules about brigading, posting illegal content, etc. and are still allowed to operate. They followed MGTOW to ruqqus and threatened the admins to ban them, leading to a very disappointed exodus.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Why did they follow MGTOW there?

[–]Chipit 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

To do what they always do: censor.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Does MGTOW have generally anti-trans views?

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We wouldn't know - they've been censored.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Good explanation about AHS. Thanks.

Five things for /u/d3rr:

  1. Are there any anti-brigading rules for SaidIt?
  2. Are there any anti-ban-evasion rules for SaidIt? I feel I've gotten mixed signals on this.
  3. Vote manipulation is against the rules, but asking people to see and vote on something yet letting them decide for themselves is still okay, correct? (Though it's considered bad form if you do it too much, especially if it's your own content.)
  4. Have you any issues or ideas with this so far? (CC /u/Canbot, we can try to work on fair solutions rather than just give up.)
  5. Should any of this be codified and/or added to the FAQ?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Fif (I plead the fifth amendment and want a laywer)

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'll take that as permission to try to openly organize some community self-reliance stuff. You can advise us about stuff as you see it, and hopefully you'll let us know if there are any issues or problems - preferably before I get another couple strikes.

I may refute a comment or few if they shit on my shares as they do, but I won't be directly engaging socks, ActuallyNot, or others like them at length nor be trying to bait, collect, and present evidence of their persistent rule-breaking.

[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Let's be cautious.

It doesn't make sense to create rules for problems we don't yet have.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes caution and fairness are critical. As is clarity. And we do need to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

I'm not seeking to make more rules. I just want all that exist clearly listed.

Plus, I'm seeking community engagement, community self-reliance, and developing good-citizen guidelines we can all embrace, rather than hard rules, or anything that might alienate any authentic well-meaning folks with differing viewpoints. Not just for SaidIt, but whatever may come after, including /s/Cassy.

[–]Southbound06 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would it not be better to make such a rule proactively? Or wold jumping the gun create a slippery slope?