thats ok, these arent vaccines, so they arent even actually 'anti-vaxx'.

"Today we discuss a putative class action in which the named plaintiffs are a registered nurse who refuses to take a basic precaution to protect her vulnerable patients..."

The black-and-white, good v. evil construction of this the very first sentence of the piece says it all.

"A basic precaution to protect her vulnerable patients". This is stated as FACT. The vaccines are safe, they are efficacious, and they are proven.

The problem is that none of the above conditions (safety, efficacy, and proof) are actually yet met. The promoters of the vaccines are working with the simple axiom "We say it; therefore it's true." This is beyond dangerous. THE fundamental key to science is being ignored: time. Without the variable time involved, science immediately reverts to quackery. It takes time to discover if new technologies, techniques, and medicines are beneficial or harmful. It is abundantly clear that this simple foundation of what science IS has been tossed to the side in the interests of those at the top of the for-profit medical/biopharm pyramid. They don't want patient work to determine the profile of the new vaccines they have created. They want adulation, they want it now, and they are willing to force what is basically still a brand-new therapy on to people to prove their point.

Simple-mindedness wedded to hubris and partisanship. We are witnessing in real time exactly what can go wrong with the combination of these three ingredients.

Ugh. It would be v. nice if this were overturned on appeal and the appellate court smacked the lower court's peepee for bad judgin. I'm not holding my breath though.