you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Thanks for the info. Even if all of this were true, it's still considered by many to be a consipracy theory, and thus not very helpful in discussions regarding real-world solutions.

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

It is true.

If you feel like reading (pdf) or listening (audio book), so you can learn more, here is a cursory outline you can step your toe into that covers some of the history of International Central Banking classes:

"A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind":

https://28chan.org/board/pol/res/228.html

[–]RightousBob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Don't waste your time with Socks they are a resident Status Quo SHILL. They just nay say and dismiss any and all concepts that aren't on their CIA/MSM list of talking points. Their efforts are meagre and quite pathetic.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Thanks, but this conspiracy approach to an NWO isn't corrobrated by anything reliable (again, even if it's true). For example, the Federal Reserve corruption is real, but it's not NEW, and not part of a NEW World Order. It dates back to the 18th century. Referring to it as an NWO perhaps excites people, but if you want anyone to believe you, read about the history of this, or also see the youtube videos by /u/magnora7, who also addresses this history, which is discussed in several very good books, some of which dealing with the Rothschilds. Use credible sources to make your points, rather than conspiracy nonsense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    Yin - these notes and further above are mainly talking points from alt-right social networking sites.

    As I've mentioned, if you'd want to be taken seriously, do consider better sources

    One reason for an active conspiracy network is to develop an audience that argues over facts and science, while the 1% continue to take your money. In that manner, the conspiracy networks mearly circle jerk each other with the same talking points, but NEVER mention one essential issue:

    What are you going to do about it? What are the solutions? Some of these people have torched G5 towers in the UK. But: what will be the legal solutions? You don't have to bother answering any of this. Just making a point.

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      FFS - there are no NWO talking points, unless of course you think I live entirely on the internet.

      And of course: you've mentioned NO approaches to solutions. It's just whining from many here on Saidit. Really sad.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        I suppose you're not referring to "woke" people, especially on Saidit.

        And a solution is not a generalization, which is merely a cop out.

        How would one expect to wake people, and what would be the political method for change? Can these people take on the banks? Can politicians do it? My view is that there are democratic solutions that will engage politicians in the current system. That's the quickest, less disruptive option. The only alternative to it is a violent revolution, which is not a viable solution for most. I mention these options occasionally on Saidit. I think no one here really wants to think about it. They just want to whine, and repeat what they think is popular in their circle of online strangers. None of those people will come through for you.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Yes - part of the Enlightenment interests of the 18th century, to develop the "American experiment" with the scientific and Enlightenment ideas of the time. If NWO is to refer to the Enlightenment, the problems of the Federal Reserve - whcih Kennedy tried to resolve before he was murdered - go out of focus. Big banks, big pharma, big corp, big news media, etc, etc, are all part of a long tradition of cultural decline for all societies. Oswald Spengler wrote about it, with long charts detailing these declines.

          [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          Too much disinfo to argue with, shill.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Of course you haven't a clue

          [–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          I don't want your clues from MSM, shill.