you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

That depends on the person determining their sex. If one starts making concrete rules such as "penis = male" or "XX = female". Then you end up with contradictions.

[–]lestratege 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

That depends on the person determining their sex. If one starts making concrete rules such as "penis = male" or "XX = female". Then you end up with contradictions.

Male = small gametes, female = big gametes. That's how biology differentiates sexes. And that ability does not appear out of nowhere, so disorder in its development do exist, but this does not negate the fact that there are only two sexes. Just like people born without legs do not negate the fact that humans are bipedal.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

> Just like people born without legs do not negate the fact that humans are bipedal.

[–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, that particular person is not bipedal. And if you breed enough of them then those humans are not bipedal.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yet the human species remains bipedal, with 2 sexes.

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because no one is crazy enough to breed only non-bipedal humans.