you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (64 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (63 children)

    Saidit is noticeably quieter without Bob and Jason.

    Bob posted about me on s/retards and I still don't think she should be banned. I think she's too sympathetic to the ironleft but pretty sure that shouldn't be a bannable offense. They piss me off but if they weren't such dicks I'd support them too for the sake of free speech, but imo threatening violence is inexcusable. And before that they wanted reparations, which was silly.

    What's the point of a well behaved forum if nobody is saying anything.

    Their ban is probably permanent

    I will protest. I like talking to Bob. Stop banning people I talk to ffs. I mean the "royal you," I know you didn't personally ban anyone this time.

    [–][deleted]  (62 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Comatoast 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (61 children)

      I mean, I'm not addicted to alcohol (far from it), and somewhat against pornography and enjoy talking to Bob. I enjoy following your material and exchanges as well. She's aggressive, but the two of you just have it out for one another-- despite whoever started what. Y'all just don't need to mention or interact with one another at all. Come on though, you can have conversations with people and consider them to be friends without having to respect ways that they behave under conditions outside of your control and be damned to behave similarly.

      The last month has been an descent into some crazy shit over s/all, just in general with a ton of folks. Maybe it's always been going on and I didn't see it before, but I don't think so.

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (60 children)

      She's aggressive, but the two of you just have it out for one another-- despite whoever started what. Y'all just don't need to mention or interact with one another at all.

      I had them blocked, which is why I didn't know they where banned until Musky brought it up. Magnora banned Bob because they where breaking the rules on a daily basis ever since their account was made — and because they where literally reposting the removed comments of a user who's been banned hundreds of times for, among other things: using fake accounts to get their posts on the front page (which u/bobbobbybob had also been doing).

      The last month has been an descent into some crazy shit over s/all

      Everything on the front page is fake. LXXXVIII has been using alt accounts to pick and choose what shows up — admitting to such on multiple occasions. That's why I mostly just pay attention to new instead of hot.

      [–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (59 children)

      I saw the conversation between the two of them and was under the impression that Bob left on her own after getting pissed, and Mag7 just kinda remarking with a general "Don't let the door hit ya" sort of comment.

      I know she reposted some of the content, and that can be seen as being antagonistic, but she was genuinely pissed about some of the topics of conversation that the Roman numerals crew posted being banned because of wanting to discuss it. I don't think she's a shill, she's just hot headed and pissy about things. I don't see the account creation or anything that you mention, wouldn't know about it outside of your mention, so I'm not sure what's going on there.

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (58 children)

      I saw the conversation between the two of them and was under the impression that Bob left on her own after getting pissed, and Mag7 just kinda remarking with a general "Don't let the door hit ya" sort of comment.

      That seems to be what happened, but Musky said they where also banned, I checked, and it was true.

      she was genuinely pissed about some of the topics of conversation that the Roman numerals crew posted being banned because of wanting to discuss it.

      Because they're the same person.

      I don't see the account creation or anything that you mention, wouldn't know about it outside of your mention, so I'm not sure what's going on there.

      They're empty accounts that just exist to vote on content. It's hard to find them, even for admins.

      Here's a screenshot of a bunch we found a few days ago. We can see what they voted on: here's a screenshot of one of these alts voting for u/bobbobbybob's posts, extended here. (I had to scroll down a bit since he votes on a lot of spam.)

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (57 children)

      Amelia, the nazipuses just upvote random people, spam, and occasionally porn. They upvoted one of my posts once and I think they're dicks and they called me a pedo sympathizer so we ain't buds. Bob is sympathetic to the nazipi but I'm 99.99% she's not part of that directly.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (56 children)

      Not part of it directly even though they directly reposted their removed comments and posts? I ain't buyin it.

      [–][deleted]  (52 children)

      [removed]

        [–]NodeThis is my flair. There are many like it, but this one is mine. 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Not part of it directly even though they directly reposted their removed comments

        I don't think I've done it here, but I've often reposted deleted comments in order to reply to them. That is, as long as I've opened a new tab and still have the original to copy.