/u/magnora7 needs to RESIGN.

submitted by Save_SaidIt from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Now who's trolling?

You were trolling before? That's good to know.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Seriously? You just accused me of being on the troll's side. This is the kind of shit you pull when YOU have your meltdowns and accuse people of lying and/or ban them. Don't be childish in a serious discussion if you want to be taken seriously. Reply if you want, but don't expect an answer today because you need to regain your senses and I'm going to give you the time you need before we continue.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Well you promote their agenda by crying for them atleast

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

And funny how the shill OP post just happened to mention Jason twice, in very glowing terms. And uses the same formatting style that Jason does in his posts. Coincidence?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Me think not but who knows

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

So it was just coincidence he was mentioned twice and has the same formatting in his own posts?

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

If the formatting style is identical then its suspicious but JC has been in this site longer than those trolls. They came when voat got shut down

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, but the trolls have also used some 8 month old accounts they've been aging, which has been verified 100%. This attack has been almost a year in the making, and is part of a larger ongoing attack. They also try to get people on the inside who "play nice" so then when things go bad they have more leverage and control.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I hope you don't trust anyone here unless you know them. Don't hire people for coding or improving the site. It's good as it is.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

If we hired someone to code, I would be the one to find them, and we would review all code thoroughly before adding it to the codebase. Security has been a focus from the start, but I also don't want the site to die off and be irrelevant, so there has to be a balance