The existence of the word "racism" itself proves that racism is true, because if it weren't, it would just be called lying

submitted by Klenvastergan from self.whatever

Here I'm using racism as it is used by the modern globalist media, to refer to speech in defense of White people and critical of nonwhites.

The existence of the word racism itself proves that racism is true, because if it were not true, it would just be called lying.

Someone would say, "Blacks are violent thugs" and someone else would say "Stop lying about blacks, they are just as peacable as White people," and the first person would be like "Nuh uh" and the second person would be like "Here's all the evidence, it shows they're totally chill."

However in the real world, where racism is true, the way that conversation would go is

P1: "Blacks are violent thugs" P2: "Stop lying, they are just as peaceable as White people," P1: "Actually here is all this evidence that they are much more violent than White people." P2: "Shut up, RACIST."

Except that P2 will usually skip past bothering to accuse someone of lying and cut right to the accusation of racism.

This is because racism is a word meant to communicate "These views are bad regardless of or even because they are true," and to get you to treat truth itself as inherently suspect.

This is because racism - which is to say, a positive view of the White race and a critical view of nonwhites - is true and good, and anti-racism is evil.

Truth is God.

all 52 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (25 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

    Oh boy, here we go again. It's the Jews' fault. If the Jews are as all-powerful as you think they are, it's only because your father was too stupid and weak to run his own civilization. Your father chose to be a chattel slave. I feel sorry for you. It's not your fault that the men in your ancestry were so emasculated, but stop blaming other people for your failure. Look in the mirror.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

    If someone poisons another person and the second person dies, normal people blame the poisoner and the poison, not the poisoned person.

    Jews don't run civilization, they're just one of the things killing it.

    Civilization had antibodies against them for thousands of years that got overwhelmed when the jews got their hands on mass media. It's not hard to understand or anything. Civilization will even work out new antibodies if the jews don't kill it first.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

    Why are you so weak? Just be a man. Stop living in fear of the boogeyman. I pity you.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

    Sorry they did this to you.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

    Hey, am I the one who is terrified of "Jews?" Look at yourself in the mirror. The Jews didnt cause that. That's generations of bad decisions. You are afraid of Jews because they conquered you. I get it.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    You obviously mistook my comment. No one has been fully conquered. They built this empire off of lies, sandy foundations for a castle that will never come. They do not have what it takes to keep this machine running.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    You are conquered. You are chattel. Look at you furiously typing away on the Jewish social networks. You cant even fear then, but that they order you to do so.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    "You can't even fear then, but that they order you to do so."

    What? Is your algorithm messing up?

    [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I know. I cannot make sense of this poster. He calls Yeshua a pedophile and then tells Christians to fear Jews. I think his goal is to create anti-Jewish sentiment, exactly what Herzl advocated.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    So, I won the argument? You're making fun of a typo. Good.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Yes, you are pretty obviously terrified of jews.

    It's sad, and I feel bad for you.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    They're a scary people. They conquered Europe without ever fielding an army. They are the most powerful nation to have existed in human history.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    They didn't conquer Europe. They indebted us to them. There is a difference. We can undo what has been done. If we were conquered to the last, then there would be no hope. Plus, the fools pissed off many other cultures to get to where they are today. We have more allies today than ever before.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The European anti-semite is the victim of his own debased, perverted culture. I'm honestly asking you if you know what "logic" is? You cant argue that the Jews run an all powerful conspiracy, but then say that your father is a man, and not a little bitch. If your Jewish masters are so powerful that you need to devote your entire being to fighting them, it's only because your father was too busy masturbating to stop it from happening. The Jews dont care about you because you're weak and stupid. You dont know politics, science, history or logic. All you know is pornography, christian voodoo, and fear.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    They conquered you so completely that you're on the internet simping for them, so there's that.

    Aside from that they're really quite pathetic.

    [–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I dont talk about "pathetic" European-derived people who live in Appalacia, rape their children, and suck down opiates with Mountain Dew all day. I dont talk about them except in this specific instance.

    So, why you talk about the Jews? Why dont you talk about the people who are responsible for making you stupid, fat, and ugly?

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I cannot make sense of you. Are you pro-Herzl ideology?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You don't know the history of Europe if you think that's how shit went down. For example, my people could not be beaten by the Roman Empire. We were not beaten by the foreign mercenaries sent by the ailing coffer-counters and their missionaries. We were not beaten by their sharp minds, or by their superior words. In fact, if you read their works, they often say the Scottish mind is second only to the Jewish mind. I would say the Jewish mind only beat the Scottish mind because they paid a Scot to argue their case for them. And it's been working, pretty effectively too. It's working better with us indebted to them than any other Empire, so I think its pretty damn telling that they couldn't get global power until they beat down the clan-system in the North. In the first generation after securing all our lands, they immediately made companies to go out and conquer everything else.

    They hired rogue elements from amongst ourselves to kill us. They didn't beat us in court, or on a debate floor. They didn't beat us in one war, or in one way. They paid us to beat ourselves, essentially. And to this day, the majority of my people still deny the southerner and his debt-master. It's not your fault that the men in your ancestry were so inebriated, so high on the gifts of others, but stop acting like history is clear cut. "Oh, they lost because they were weak."

    Many lost because they weren't religious fanatics, they didn't realize the war would continue for dozens of generations. Many lost because they were so tired of fighting decade after decade, that when one of their own came around and said: "We don't have to fight them anymore, just give up." many fell for it. My people never did fall for it, not in its entirety. Now, the tide is rising again. Oh boy, here we go again, indeed.

    Look in the mirror. Could you do better than your ancestors? Do you even know where Cosmos comes from? I don't. Every European country has a different history when it comes to this struggle. Some of us fought bravely and proud, and we only lost due to treachery. Hundreds of years worth of treachery.

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Say hi to Adolph

    [–]cure_osa_disorder 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    STFU racist

    [–]cure_osa_disorder 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    To reject Judaism is to embrace the mental, moral, and spiritual slavery of dishonesty and blasphemy.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Calling someone names is much less productive than explaining why they're wrong, because all it does is generate animosity, instead of a productive conversation. The reason so many jump to name-calling is because they don't want to engage in a productive conversation with "the other," less they risk being labelled as "the other".

    It seems ironic that one arguing against racism would be labelled a "racist", however, according to the left: merely associating with racists is enough to be one. Furthermore, leftists seek to avoid any situation which may result in failure; in order to avoid failure: they refuse to even try in the first place.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Animosity is often a result of productive conversations, because making people confront truths they don't want to confront makes people mad.

    [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    are you an atheist? if so: checkmate

    except its a crap argument

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Actually it's a great argument, sorry.

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    are you an atheist?

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    No.

    Truth is God.

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    darn, well, that argument failed!

    it is my go to for neckbeard lolbertarian atheists. "When you argue against the existence of God, you first agree to the definition of the concept, which means, fundamentally., you accept it and simply rail against".

    Its a terrible argument when I use it, and the 'racism must exist as there is a word for it' argument is just as bad, but I've not me an atheist who can come up with a good counter yet

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I'm not gonna listen to your opinion on what is and isn't a terrible argument when you admit to using arguments you believe are terrible.

    [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    that kind of puerile, adolescent response is why your opinion means so little to others.

    If I use a terrible argument, it is to see if the person I am teasing has the mental faculties to be worth speaking further with. If you can't destroy my weak argument, then why would I bother investing time in a good debate?

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Why would I bother investing time in a debate with a guy who deliberately makes bad arguments?

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    i guess if you also can't show why they are bad arguments, then because it makes you look like a chump?

    Also, follow the logic flow of this conversation. I compared the OP to my own bad argument, in order to demonstrate its lack of sense. Non-linear, oblique and low key humour, all wrapped up in a debate.

    I guess erudition ain't your thang, bruh

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    The existence of the word "racism", itself, can't prove that races exist. It can't even prove that racists exist. Without some context, it doesn't even prove that anti-racists exist. With how honest the anti-racists are, they could be lying about believing in racists.

    Words like "atheist" or "christian", can't prove that God exists. They can only prove, with some context, that there are people who believe, or don't believe, in its existence.

    Personally, since evolution exists, I find the idea of races counterproductive. Races are only different because they have been created by different soils. Make survival easy, and any race would turn into a chaotic mess. Make certain traits necessary for survival, and everyone in your race would have them.

    The reasonable solution to the problem of racism, is to either invest in gene editing technology, or to strengthen your soil magic with strong laws. Allowing a random bureaucrat to decide your race, is insanity that asks to be abused.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I agree with the first half of your comment, surprised nobody else pointed out the existence of a word doesn't prove or disprove anything here, although u/bobbobbybob did mention it was a crap argument.

    As to the second half, racism itself is an ancient evolutionary mechanism formed to facilitate survival. Those within our own tribe, like us, are less likely to harm us. That's why people of different races are harder to tell apart too. There's a reason to know Bob from John, your neighbors, but an enemy can be faceless. Might suggest pattern recognization is "expensive" too.

    I don't know it can be fixed, unless you make everyone look like everyone else, and that's probably a bad idea.

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    surprised nobody else pointed out the existence of a word doesn't prove or disprove anything here

    I said "are you a atheist", which was a really short form of saying that...

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I dabbled in atheism once myself. It makes sense people would balk at dubious sources of questionable origin speaking of miracles and fantastic events without proof, particularly when miracles stop happening once everyone has video recorders on them. Why wouldn't that raise a bunch of red flags?

    There may be a God, but he doesn't talk to us, so man invented hokey religious BS without Him.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    racism itself is an ancient evolutionary mechanism formed to facilitate survival.

    Tribalism is an ancient evolutionary mechanism. Racism is a new learnt idea that can be easily used against us. Talking box heads may look like us, but unless the shaman gifts them a name, they are soulless, even if they have a face.

    That's why people of different races are harder to tell apart too.

    White paper has its advantages.

    I don't know it can be fixed

    Why fix what doesn't need fixing. Pitting people with obvious differences is easier, but rulers can pit neighbors from different parts of a city with only slightly more efforts. The problem, here, isn't the difference in appearance.

    [–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    True? Don't you mean real? Because it's for sure real.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    No, I mean true. Because racism is true.

    [–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Is that the ideology you're gonna die defending?

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Maybe, maybe not.

    It will still be true.

    [–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    There are better things to concern yourself about, dude. Even if you feel that way, fighting this fight is pretty gross.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Actually, fighting for the truth is good, and opposing those who fight for the truth is gross and creepy.

    [–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Do you just shake with anger when you get a new black coworker?

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Of course not.

    I do sometimes get angry when innocent White children are murdered by blacks, or when blacks sucker-punch innocent elderly White people in the back of the head, or any of the other incredibly common forms of horrifying black behavior.

    It's kind of gross that you don't.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Hah, reminds me of when I used to do meth except racist. It seems revelatory to you but it doesn't make logical sense.

    The existence of the word werewolves itself proves that werewolves are true

    Changed a few words to show what I mean.

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Sorry you did too much meth to follow my argument.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I once had a drug that inhibited my understanding. It was my hope for you because if you're like this sober there's no fixing you. That's just baseline you.... Oh well.