Corrected. I'm shocked and infuriated every time I delve into the Wikipedia corruption. AND every time they beg for money.

Wikipedia's primarily acceptible sources are the corporate media - but only those they consider valid. They also have some grey areas. Everything else they question - even if you have many sources. They'll say that you're overdoing it with the sources and cut them out. Then another will come in and say not enough validation. It's all gamed.

I often use their information, and often contribute to it. Doesn't mean I'm not aware of the bullshit.