I've seen all of the information spreading about the Great Reset and I'm not sure if the confusion has risen as a result of the hysteria that's been enacted upon the proles this last year due to the bioweapon/"virus", or if people are just falling for the FUD-spin being used to confuse all of you too much that you fight tooth and nail for the sake of Stockholm Syndrome and nothing else.

Let's go point by point:

The Great Reset will usher in a new era of "money" that I have comparatively little control over.

Cancel Culture caught up with Laura Loomer not too long ago. She's no longer allowed to use Uber, the service, as a result of her naughty thoughts that tptb dislike her having. If you think this is the extent of what tptb can do, please go look through all of the patreon, subscribestar and other similar services' fiascos. Observe how people are being cut off from financial assistance after they're unable to be employed, get targeted by political agents at the IRS, have their accounts liquidated or have banks or financial services cut them off.

Control over your finances has already dwindled dramatically. The issue is that too few of you say naughty things, such that your words/ideas restrict your ability to independently function financially as a result of someone, somewhere pulling strings to shut you up. You already have little control over your finances... which brings us to the next point.

The Great Reset will cancel physical money and I'll be forced to only have the ability to interact with the economy with digital monies.

This is absurd. I always assume when I hear this that people aren't familiar with what Credit is...

Your money is digital currently. There is no when, nor if. There are less physical papers in circulation than the ledger of central currencies depicts, at least in the US. You've all been using Credit for decades. That plastic rectangle in your pocket, that's currently your "money". It only has ambiguous and nonsensical numbers attached to it. In addition to this, the liquid that makes up derivatives markets, that makes up pensions, and plenty of other liquid containers are entirely ambiguous, much like the returns for large corporations. You know none of them ever report any earnings, correct? All of the big corporations are in the red and have been for likely their entire existence.

With digital money comes digital social scores and I won't be allowed to access biometric portals in order to interact with the rest of society.

When was the last time Alex Jones, love him or hate him, interacted with the rest of the internet outside of services he created?

Don't know? Well, Joe Rogan and Tim Pool are two of the few that managed to usher Jones back in to the limelight. Comically, these two are both now receiving various levels of flack from the proles that watch too much tv and go on Reddit a bit too much. This is one example, but the answer to the rhetorical question asked first overlaps a bit with this explanation.

Digital currencies are scary. Evil feds made them. They're the mark of the beast. We won't have any privacy if we let our governments make us use them.

Let's talk about privacy first. Go ahead and reach in your pocket for me. Do you see that plastic/metal box with the glass laid overtop of it? Do you see the microphone attached to it? Do you see all of those cameras attached to it? Do you know how it interacts with the world outside of your home?

You haven't had privacy for the last couple of decades, unfortunately.

So, digital currencies aren't all that scary. I'd wager plenty of you have read in to Bitcoin and the other big players a bit, but no specific currency is of much importance for the sake of this explanation. Frankly, I'm undecided about any specific ones yet, but what we care about for the sake of this discussion is Blockchain. See, your government uses a private ledger, which normies aren't allowed to observe, ask questions about or interact with at all. The antithesis of this private ledger system, which privately issues currency to and is not owned by our federal government, is Blockchain systems. Blockchain uses a decentralized public ledger. To better understand why this is important, you'll need to read the Cypherpunk Manifesto, which explains in detail the differences between privacy and secrecy:

Your government officials and the ones that own them, who work with the PRIVATE financial entities controlling said private ledger, practice secrecy via this system. You aren't allowed to know about it. You aren't allowed to enter the boundary of Federal Reserve land. You aren't allowed to issue your own IOUs either. The reality is, it's a secret and you're not invited to enjoy its splendor.

Alternatively, privacy has made its way to us via Blockchain. These transactions aren't secret. The ledger is public for all to see and everyone has a copy of it should they decide to acquire the technology for themselves. Transactions that are done between two parties via Blockchain tech aren't hidden from everyone. Instead, these transactions are made between the two parties, all without more of their information, which, admittedly can be found if someone cares that much, and are ultimately kept nearly completely private.

Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/manifesto.html

Decentralized Finance is coming. Impeding it is futile. However, if everyone thinks it's bad, we can be fooled in to rerouting that energy to a system that further indebts us to our slavers. The Great Reset doesn't have to be bad. In fact, it's a good thing so long as we aren't afraid of it.

Things can go smoothly and we can escape the slavers if we learn more about digital currencies, if we learn what kinds of issues there are with central currencies, if we better understand the current landscape as it relates to privacy, independent control over finances and the pitfalls of the current paradigm.

You didn't think it was a coincidence that no one knows who Satoshi is, did you?