you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Nemesis[S] 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (7 children)

I agree with this, I don't think it would diminish the website at all. People would actually have to put together posts, not just copy-paste random links for internet points

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

What? Sources are fine. Links are fine too. You are literally calling for censorship?

[–]Nemesis[S] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I'm guessing you misread or misunderstood, I'm not calling for the end of links/sources, this is more about post format

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Like C_S_T rules then.

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sources are fine. Links are fine too. You are literally calling for censorship?

Agreed.

Saidit preserved the useful elements of Reddit, and discarded the info suppressing features (which were deliberately added).

Divisive shilling and sock puppet upvotes are the real issues.

No easy solutions for these.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]littleboyblue 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    i am the only moderator of a reddit subreddit that is financial services related.. i registered the subreddit for a well known banking institution.. someone recently made a post that used the word "covid" and it linked to one of the more disliked major social media outlets.. this post was removed, but i did not remove it.. who removed it?

    censorship is now the norm.

    fyi, in indonesia, a majority muslim country, unfriendly conversation is an indictable offense.

    unfriendly conversation is now an indictable offense for all countries.