all 5 comments

[–]ReeferMadness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is not how any if this works.

[–]BigFatRetard 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's insane to me that they'd attack Trump for failed business ventures while also attacking him for the successful ones.

Taking risks is part of why the rich become rich. Socialists want to come in after the fact and take the successes while letting someone else take the losses.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's not how this works.

Without the organisation no one does any labour at all, and it's the organisers that make money because thier capital is on the line, and they put obscene amounts of time and effort into building systems to provide labour to be done.

Let's not forget about 2/3 of millionaires and billionaires came from shirtsleeves and didn't inherit squat.

In another few decades virtually all of the labour will be automated, and these people will still be getting rich without workers involved anywhere.

[–]Alan_Crowe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I typed in my response to u/EndlessSunflowers two days ago. Basically what you said, but lots of words, too many words :-(

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go on twitter. It really teaches brevity.