Why did both my account and my subsaidit get banned?

submitted by HelpIMBanned from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The guy made a sub to literally promote 1940s Nazism. He was literally using banner images from 1940s German propaganda. We don't allow for the promotion of violence here, and that includes ideologies that advocate for the extermination of other races.

Seems like that should be pretty obvious, tbh. People are welcome to go to voat or poal if they think this is too limiting.

[–]antireddit 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for being honest about it. I have no particular love for Nazis, but I dont believe the cartoonish hollywood propaganda we get about them as the embodiment of evil is accurate either. Ironically I think because they are portrayed this way, there are a segment of antisocial people who are attracted to their ideology just because its so forbidden.

I get that its a lightning rod and dont blame for you taking the stance. It's definitely not a hill worth dying on, but as someone else said it can be a free speech canary in a coal mine, and it's unlikely the thought police will be satisfied with only that for very long.

[–]Leo_Littlebook 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's nonsense. You obviously do permit the advocacy of "violence", when it's lawful or when it's war. Nor have I seen evidence that the Nazis advocated for the extermination of other races. There is better evidence for Australians, Chinese and Americans doing that, but you don't ban their iconography. The Holocaust is an obvious hoax to anyone who investigates fairmindedly.

If you want to limit Nazi trolls, you should ban them for rules of debate violations. There are some NatSocs who would follow the rules, and they would improve the site. The majority of the Voat mouthbreathers would get caught by existing rules.

The reality is that you're a bit too scared of Jewish power, and a bit too indoctrinated with Jewish lies, to do that.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, if you get mad at Hitler in this regard, you must be even more upset with what happened with the First Nations of America. It was literal genocide for many tribes. But here we are, free to make subs about how great we think America is.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

that includes ideologies that advocate for the extermination of other races.

Where did the National Socialists actually advocate for such?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

THEY NEVER DID.

u/magnora7 has been bought and paid for, or threatened, or something. They got to him­. It's over, TRUTH IS BANNED ON SAIDIT.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You've gone too far, magnora7. You're doing the same thing as Antifa: trying to destroy history because it is inconvenient. Next we won't be able to discuss the Sandy Hook hoax because it was about killing schoolchildren.

Talking about 1940s Nazism should not be forbidden on a "free speech" site. And so what if somebody uses favorable terms? Can you debunk these views? If so, a true FREE SPEECH place will let you do that.