Firefox just died for me today after I found out they support BLM. I'm now on Brave browser!

submitted by suckitreddit from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cisheteroscum 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

Fine - but it's hardly a significant difference. People forget how hard and fast the left tried to normalize gay marriage. By contrast, terrorist BLM has received billions of dollars from private corporations and nothing will happen to these companies

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

People forget how hard and fast the left tried to normalize gay marriage.

the left

hard and fast

The first Pride march was organized in 1970. At that time even gay relations were generally criminal, let alone gay marriage. "The left" didn't push gay marriage "hard and fast"; support for gay rights was a minority issue even among the left at that time. Gay rights activists fought for those rights over the course of nearly 50 years. If you were surprised by how "fast" it happened, then you probably just weren't paying attention.

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The first Pride march was organized in 1970

I like your intentional conflation of "gay marriage" and "gay activism". The stonewall event had nothing to do with "gay marriage" but was a response to police raids that ended up having ripple effects across the West for homosexuals in the 1970s. The "Defense of Marriage" Act was signed by democrat Bill Clinton in 1996, 26 years later than stonewall and only in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 was it determined by the Supreme Court that denial of same-sex marriage by the states was illegal. That was five years ago - and one year after this CEO made his contribution

If you were surprised by how "fast" it happened

It did. Objectively. The American public did not support same-sex marriage as recently as 2004. Anecdotally, I remember the only exposure in the MSM for gays was a show "Queer Eye for the Striaght Guy", a pun I didn't understand until years later. The promotion of gays and homosexuality in the MSM has accelerated exponentially in the last 15 years compared to before. Maybe you were the one not paying attention

Even if we pretend all that isn't true, and Americans and US Courts weren't incredibly morally corrupted in a few short years, and "gay marriage" was all the result of some "gradual, progressive change" over the years - "Gay marriage" is still a joke and paraody on actual marriage. By and large, gays are not remotely monogamous - they have way more partners and diseases than straight people or wedded heterosexual couples. Gays also cannot reproduce, and they have no benefit to the future of state - which is the only reason benefits for marriage should exist. And if that isn't true, then marriage is just a religious institution that shouldn't be corrupted by the state.

Regardless of all of that, the firefox CEO was completely in his rights to donate against the cause of "gay marriage" at the time, and evem today. He was effectively denied his right to free speech when he was fired and lost his source of income - just because he opposed the fake "rights" of homosexuals to marry. Which was a prescient, ongoing issue at the time.

I also like your non-response to this:

By contrast, terrorist BLM has received billions of dollars from private corporations and nothing will happen to these companies

[–]Etsestases 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

gays are not remotely monogamous - they have way more partners and diseases than straight people or wedded heterosexual couples.

And straight men are rapists who can't even make women orgasm 35% of the time, compared to lesbians who don't orgasm just 14% of the time, all they care about is their own pleasure and getting off. Selfish bastards.

I feel bad for women who marry men. Gay men are less violent, less rapey, abuse their partners way less often and actually care about their partner's pleasure.

[–]NatSoc_Fren 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

less violent

less rapey

1

• Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

• Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

• The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

• Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

• Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

• Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

2

• Bisexual women had significantly higher lifetime prevalence of rape and sexual violence other than rape by any perpetrator when compared to heterosexual women.

• Lesbian women and gay men reported levels of intimate partner violence and sexual violence equal to or higher than those of heterosexuals.

[–]Etsestases 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't know why you bring the topic of pedophilia, but okay then:

Pedophiles are people attracted to children, it has nothing to do with homosexuality, even if the kid is male. Most of the offenders who rape boys, are simultaneously attracted to women. In virtually all cases when a pedophile who rapes a boy is married, he's married to a woman.

I don't know what kind of world you live in. Statistics are iffy and they throw different percentages in this regard, but you're giving the lowest estimates of them all when you say 1-3. I can also point to other studies or surveys where it's way higher.

Heterosexual males have legalized child marriage in plenty of countries, and still practice it in huge numbers. Even in some western countries, there are states where straight men can marry children or teens. That's sick.

About 1.8 billion people, most of them heterosexual, follow a religion in which their prophet married a 6 year old girl, and had sex with her when she was 9. These people defend this pedophile with violence and death when you criticize him. Talk about heterosexuals glorifying pedophilia and having it as part of their culture. Disgusting. And there are some pedophiliac aspects to Christianity as well, religion followed by over 2.3 billion people. That's a whooping 4.1 billion people, mostly heterosexual, who glorify pedophilia and made it part of their culture. Homosexuals are irreligious in way higher proportions than heterosexuals.

Straight men mutilate the genitals of young girls in many countries so they can't feel sexual pleasure for the rest of their lives. Sick perverts.

Lesbian women and gay men reported levels of intimate partner violence and sexual violence equal to or higher than those of heterosexuals.

That's not true for gay men. I didn't speak about homosexual women.

[–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Pedophiles are people attracted to children, it has nothing to do with homosexuality, even if the kid is male. Most of the offenders who rape boys, are simultaneously attracted to women. In virtually all cases when a pedophile who rapes a boy is married, he's married to a woman.

You don't even know what "straight" means do ya?

I don't know what kind of world you live in. Statistics are iffy and they throw different percentages in this regard, but you're giving the lowest estimates of them all when you say 1-3. I can also point to other studies or surveys where it's way higher.

Cope moar, statistics don't lie.

Heterosexual males have legalized child marriage in plenty of countries, and still practice it in huge numbers. Even in some western countries, there are states where straight men can marry children or teens. That's sick.

Where faggot?

About 1.8 billion people, most of them heterosexual, follow a religion in which their prophet married a 6 year old girl, and had sex with her when she was 9. These people defend this pedophile with violence and death when you criticize him. Talk about heterosexuals glorifying pedophilia and having it as part of their culture. Disgusting. And there are some pedophiliac aspects to Christianity as well, religion followed by over 2.3 billion people. That's a whooping 4.1 billion people, mostly heterosexual, who glorify pedophilia and made it part of their culture. Homosexuals are irreligious in way higher proportions than heterosexuals.

Christianity has no "pedophiliac aspects" to it. And don't ever group in Muslims with Christians, because Muslims are fucked on another level. I'm not responsible for some sandnigger raping a goat or fucking a child. That's none of my business. I gave you links between modern day pedophilia in America(because I'm not from some sandnigger country) and homosexuality. You have yet to disprove it.

Straight men mutilate the genitals of young girls in many countries so they can't feel sexual pleasure for the rest of their lives. Sick perverts.

As I said, sandniggers are not Christians.

That's not true for gay men.

Prove it faggot

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Bwahaha so you basically just resorted to throw slurs around (with terrible punctuation) and say heterosexual pedophilia doesn't count because these straight men are from countries other than yours. Pathetic defense.

You and your fellow straight male brethren are rotten. I wonder how many underage girls were married to an adult man today alone worldwide. Sick perverts.

Maybe you're still upset for the banning of the straight male subreddit r/jailbait in 2011? Are you a r/jailbait refugee?

r/jailbait, which featured provocative shots of underage teenagers, being chosen "subreddit of the year" in the "Best of reddit" user poll in 2008 and at one point making "jailbait" the second most common search term for the site

Soon after the closure of r/jailbait, the similar subreddits r/teen_girls, r/niggerjailbait and r/picsofdeadjailbait were closed.

Disgusting.

I know you are upset, but please, don't go on a rape spree or behead spree like you were commenting. Try to ignore these heterosexual instincts, they're harmful for civilization. Kkthx

[–]NatSoc_Fren 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's natural for goat fuckers to be pedophiles, and I presume that you're not from some middle eastern backward country. If you are, it's none of my business fag. I'm talking about my country. Other countries can go fuck themselves for all I care

Maybe you're still upset for the banning of the straight male subreddit r/jailbait in 2011? Are you a r/jailbait refugee?

Quite contrary to your statement, I helped it get banned

I know you are upset, but please, don't go on a rape spree or behead spree like you were commenting. Try to ignore these heterosexual instincts, they're harmful for civilization. Kkthx

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2118217/

[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ghey propaganda

[–]cisheteroscum 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

LOL wow I never could've anticipated such a retarded and ineffectual response. Here I was expecting something to the tune of "but firefox is private companiee!!" but no - you instead equate the institution of marriage and reproduction with orgasms, and make the ridiculous assertion that all straight men are "rapists", without even acknowledging any of the main points. I can't even tell if you're a troll or not. All of your statements on gay men are also unsubstantiated and and almost definitely wrong, there's a lot of predators in the gay community (and a lot of drugs, disease, and pedophilia). You don't have to respond, don't bother

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No need to get emotional. Come back when you can debunk anything I said. I also never said "all straight men" (yawn) at any point, I said "straight men" just like you said "gay men". Now go marry a female child or a teen like the straight males who institutionalized it in many countries do. (And even in some states of your own country, if you're american)

[–]NatSoc_Fren 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Bro, you're the one getting emotional. But don't worry, we'll find the cure, soon

[–]Etsestases 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You won't find anything. You sound useless. If anything, say "they".

[–]NatSoc_Fren 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I won't find anything because I am not a biochemist, I will however gladly fund research for the cure.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I like your intentional conflation of "gay marriage" and "gay activism".

You should spend more time reading before responding. It's not conflation, as the two concepts are intertwined. Legal gay marriage was the ultimate achievement of the gay rights movement. I mean, jesus dude if you seriously don't understand how gay activism and gay marriage are related, then I have some questions about the bus you rode to school, particularly about its length.

You should spend more time reading before responding. Your "history" sucks and is full of holes. Gay acceptance was a very gradual process. It started first with getting gay relations decriminalized and just not being hated for being gay.

It did. Objectively. The American public did not support same-sex marriage as recently as 2004.

You should spend more time reading before responding. I've already linked historical polls on gay acceptance, but if you missed them the first time, here they are again. It was indeed a gradual process, it was just once supporters of gay marriage became a majority that things started happening in the political sphere.

Even if we pretend all that isn't true, and Americans and US Courts weren't incredibly morally corrupted in a few short years, and "gay marriage" was all the result of some "gradual, progressive change" over the years

Well, you may think it's pretending, but that's just because you are poorly informed.

I also like your non-response to this

Because the types of people that call BLM "terrorists" are just retards living in their own little world and I try not to engage too much because the conversation always spirals. I can only imagine how long your rant would have been if I had responded to two points instead of just one.

[–]cisheteroscum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You should spend more time reading

I read everything you posted, and none of it matters. You posted a poll that agreed with mine, there's nothing to see. You may recollect or characterize homosexual acceptance differently, but that's subjective. FWIW, I don't give too many fucks about "gay marriage" beyond pointing out its a mockery of real marriage and has no practical purpose. The CEO was entirely within his rights and reason to oppose this movement at the time, its appalling he was fired

the types of people that call BLM "terrorists" are just retards

So looting, rioting, and attacking random people is called what? "Activism?"

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gays were free to live as they wished, "getting married" was an effort to pretend that anal sex can result in children. There were many politicians who were known to be gay and lived with their gay lover, even in the 1930s, and no one charged them for that (at least in some european countries).

[–]Klondike 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

How is denying someone's rights not a significant difference?

[–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Gay marriage" is not a right. At least, the rogue supreme court didn't say it was until 2015. It's been dishing out fake ""rights"" for awhile now

Say nothing of the fact that this CEO's right to free speech was effectively denied by his employer, who terminated his employment and thus source of income over issues that were prescient at the time.

https://saidit.net/s/whatever/comments/6915/firefox_just_died_for_me_today_after_i_found_out/oa5h

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]cisheteroscum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh right - we all want to live in a country where the right to free speech only applies to "the government" and is effectively useless because private companies can and will fire you, doxx you, and censor you for your private views or actions. That's why we're all here on saidit

    [–]Klondike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's wild how much time this guy has devoted to thinking about what married gay men do in their bedroom.