you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Snowden is a limited hangout - he revealed NOTHING new, and Glenn Greenwald just handed over all the documents to his Intercept billionaire publisher with less than 10% of the leaks published. Further, Snowden does not condemn Greenwald nor the Intercept for dragging their feet, AND Snowden won't criticize the "official" narrative of 9/11 much less discuss the NDAA 2012 allowing domestic propaganda and psyops in the USA.

[–]ManWithABanana 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Wow - Snowden really gets you going doesn't he ?

All I see from this guy is an intelligent man who did what he thought he needed to do, fled the country, and has to be super disappointed in what happened afterwards. I've read a ton of your comments and I'm not getting what your problem is with him.

Edit : I see now. You think he's a CIA asset. Did I get it right ?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

/u/Leo_Littlebook

/u/JasonCarswell

Part 3 - MuckRacker Rants


On one up to date website it says she enjoys sports, music and spending time with her husband and three children.

She has all the hallmarks of an undercover CIA operative. Her home in Georgia was valued at almost $700,000 a few years ago. That kind of financial status is a far cry from her own description of herself as being a "backpacker". The articles surrounding her appear to be a mishmash of emotional drivel. Arousing all the mundane tasks of a laboring Christian or in other biographies, a warm-hearted western backpacker. As if the writers were given a checklist to checkoff from higher ups.

In nearly all psychological operations where assets are used to push limited hangouts and manage perception, these assets describe themselves as “christians” and happen to be Americans.

In a blog referenced here called 'earthinggb' and quoted until further notice, we read:

Meanwhile, Philip is described thus:

In a prepared statement to the media, the Wood family described Philip Wood as "incredibly generous, creative and intelligent.”

"Phil cared about people, his family, and above all, Christ,” they said in the statement. “Though our hearts are hurting, we know so many families around the world are affected just as much as us by this terrible tragedy. We ask for your prayers, not only for ourselves, but for all involved during this difficult time.”

Also, ask yourself why all corporate media agencies are allowing Bajc to speak her mind, ask yourself too, why they give Snowdon a platform? Fox, the BBC, CNN, ABC news, etc. Are we really to believe that Bajc made it past the media censors? They have a seven second delay and could have easily cutout Bajc's references to a grand cover-up that everyone has eaten up. It is almost as if they wanted these questions aired.

We know the corporate media has lied to us and covered-up 9/11 and has been complicit in the biggest false flag crimes of the past century. In this context, it seems reasonable to conclude that Bajc is a player in intelligence theater.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1zNy-5ESos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zVor7e8Jw0

In the former BBC video link above:

Bajc states:

"Oops! That’s the wrong place.”

Then;

"It’s just like a magician playing tricks on the audience."

Then;

"That must be incredibly difficult for you emotionally?”

...and watch our Sarah – can she put on the teary act all of a sudden? No. That would just be a little too “prompted” and obvious and the question has thrown her a bit of a curve ball.

"Ah..it..it..it’s frustrating!”

Frustrating? Not “Yes it is….” as she let’s by a little smile as if her real knowledge of her lack of a need to be emotionally affected has dawned on her and she let’s her guard slip.

Watch Danica Weeks (as she speaks about that wonderful, heart-wrenching story – perfect drama) hold onto her prop (her wedding ring) displaying it to the world.

...“amazing…amazing” she says – I was a father like she describes and it never made me amazing. He’s ex army (notice she then trips over her words just after this as if she thought “damn it, I never meant to say that”) but while there is the squeaky, croaky voice and the pained expression and sniffs, there is not a single tear. Eyes as dry as a kangaroo on a barbie on a Brisbane midsummer’s day.

Add all of this to the two South African girls’s story about sharing the cockpit with the co-pilot 2 years ago and the fact that that is now a proven lie and add the innumerable “leads” and “leaked information” given by a score of “unnamed sources” which then go dead but do the job of confusing the entire picture, i.e. perception management. Add the photos of the “stolen passports Iranians” with the same legs, and you have the typical CIA-Mossad PsyOp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1gdPjarz4g

Look at their placards in the video thumbnail above. A good number of them all, obviously, having been made/designed by a single source. This is managed. Think about any large protest in the UK (or anywhere) where it has been honestly grassroots. There are very few I admit but there have been some. They tend not to have a “brand design” of placard or flags or whatever. The Trade Union managed protests and “official type” protests do however. These people protesting the Malaysian embassy in Beijing have been put together by a controlling element. No doubt about it. There is a whole lot more as you know but, with all of it, it is quite clear that this entire event is another “Sandy Hook”. It is stage managed from start to finish. These people can snigger at fooling so many but sorry, it ain’t working on me. It’s another “9/11” while now we’re being told they may never find the wreckage and there may never be an answer. The PERFECT place for them to say the plane went down is where they say it did and that is for their purpose. Just like Bin Laden and his “watery grave”.

End Quote

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/mh370-left-behind/

Of course, Bajc believes the authorities (Malaysian) are lying. To note, Malaysian authorities have been quite "anti-Semitic" as the narratives goes, against Israel and Zionism.

If she talks about anything but those Indian Ocean islands it takes the attention away from it or maybe the entire event is a fabrication from start to the eventual finish. With only one American adult on the passenger manifest she is essentially the mouthpiece for America's involvement in the case.

So, what appears now evident is that Sarah Bajc is either the most selfish "mourner" I have ever seen or on a lot of hallucinogens, and I am far from alone in this opinion. She seems to be loving the spotlight and has disregarded the "grief timeline" as all agents do. Never have I seen a "grieving" person so in love with TV's media attention. She calls her man a companion or partner, never using anything with heart. She never said once she loved him, never seemed to cry for him, and only at first brought up the fact of his children that did love him.

According to one civilian journalist, he writes:

Been around a lot of major tragedies as part of my line of work, and I know we all grieve differently, but never seen someone like her. She always goes straight to "I" and "me." I'm from NY and knew many first responders of 9-11-2001. No victims' family member has ever acted like her. No first responders that were there act like her. [EXCEPT FOR INTELLIGENCE SPOOK ALICE HOAGLAND and her gay Rugby playing son Mark Bingham.] After the many FD and first responder memorials I just attended the other day I felt a strong sense of anger towards this woman after seeing her most recent "TV Time..."

And we must remember, "Wood's" hilarious text message posted on 4chan, of all places, that Bajc claimed wasn't Phil who sent it. How would she know? Would she not at least want the American government to investigate it? But, no, she just accepted what the American government said when they said that the text message was not from her husband. Sort of like how Alice Hoagland propagandized the official government conspiracy theory narrative the day of 9/11 after her son allegedly died on Flight 93. She too skipped the grief timeline and decided instead to conduct numerous interviews displaying duping delight and stating:

I trust them [Department of Defense and State Department] implicitly.

Not only did Bajc accept, straight away, what the American government said, she started telling people online, who thought that the text message was from Phil, that the message was not from her husband, and even if the text message was a fabrication from the very beginning (which it probably was), it certainly gives Bajc away. I know that if I had a missing relative, and a message came through claiming to be that missing relative, I'd be really looking into it and no way would I say it is a fake message straight away.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/27/sarah-bacj-malaysia-airlines-missing-partner-philip-wood-texas/6961903/

[–]ManWithABanana 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

limited hangouts

I have noticed that when technical terms like this are used, and the audience (me, and others) have no idea what they mean, and then they keep getting used, the story becomes less believable.

What I'm getting from context is a "limited hangout" is an intelligence agency revealing some, unimportant, details to the public. This is to make the public think that's the whole story. And I guess Snowden is one - okay.

What was always obvious to me was that Snowden was going to be wrong about some pieces of his story. Whatever he knew, it wasn't the complete picture. There's probably more going on than we all heard about, powerpoints and all the rest notwithstanding. None of that detracts from the critical message he tried to push out.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Your definition is close, but I wouldn't say the details are "unimportant". Just the other day I defined it as, "_ A limited hangout is someone who tells part of the ugly truth, enough to make you stop asking questions despite the fact that there is MUCH more to be revealed._"

ie: "I confess I raped my sister." And they take him to jail for a bit, meanwhile he has 14 undiscovered corpses in his basement.

"Limited hangout" is hardly a rare nor technical term, though it is primarily used in government, media, deepstate and spycraft. A search will reveal much quickly:
https://SaidIt.net/search?q=limited+hangout
https://DuckDuckGo.com/?q=limited+hangout
https://WikiSpooks.com/wiki/Limited_hangout
https://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

If you want to understand the levers of power and manipulation you'll need to learn their lingo. I don't see how a story becomes unbelievable because an (easily looked up) unknown term is repeatedly used, if anything, to me it would seem they know more about it and the terminology than I do.

If you come up with other curious terms research them and feel free to post what you discover in /s/Terminology, or ask, me or /u/Jesus or anyone, to draft up a clarification definition and/or post there.

I agree with your last paragraph too, in that the message was critical, though I don't know if Snowden was wrong about anything. More importantly is how this message was pushed out. It was a sneaky political theater psyop to have people believe the evil spying government let one slip away to reveal how they spy on us. No one in the government has the balls to just admit it - because that individual or group would be demonized and the spying could potentially be "shut down" (they would never actually close it).

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A limited hangout is someone who tells part of the ugly truth, enough to make you stop asking questions despite the fact that there is MUCH more to be revealed._"

Precisely. I'm not saying Snowden is useless.

But he clearly is using perception management in many corporate news interviews.

And I cannot get myself by the fact rhat he had free reign on corporate news.

[–]ManWithABanana 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"I confess I raped my sister." And they take him to jail for a bit, meanwhile he has 14 undiscovered corpses in his basement.

Okay. I'm not aware of what the corpses are when it comes to Snowden, all I've heard about is the rape. And I'm sure the corpses are there, to stretch the analogy, but it might not be 14 it might be less. It's probably an accurate term.

Still, I'm just suggesting that it's a really weird phrase. Neither one of us is a CIA employee.

More importantly is how this message was pushed out. It was a sneaky political theater psyop to have people believe the evil spying government let one slip away to reveal how they spy on us.

It's not necessary to invoke any conspiracy to explain what happened. Snowden was a bright guy who pulled all the right strings to get his message out. The public didn't care, the dumb bastards. Congress didn't fight the battle, the dumb schmucks. The three letter agencies all fought to keep the program because that's how life works. The president sided with the intelligence agencies, probably not seeing the damage he was doing.

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No, Snowden did not rape nor murder that I'm aware of. That was just an extreme example of a hypothetical limited hangout in two short sentences.

Assange was accused of rape but it really wasn't even close (long story), but that's what they claim they're holding him for. That whole thing is ridiculous "justice" and another limited hangout.

Neither one of us is a CIA employee.

I know I'm not, but I could be lying. You could be too. Though generally this assumption is pretty safe to jump to. An employee is one thing, but their reach extends farther to assets, confidential informants, sources, etc. Also Mossad and other agencies are just as bad.

Nixon used "limited hangout". I agree, it is an odd phrase.

It's not necessary to invoke any conspiracy to explain what happened.

It's naïve not to. Most of the world is naïve as fuck, and that's why there's a 1% who exploit everyone else.

The president sided with the intelligence agencies

The presidents are always selected by the deep state. You're beyond naïve if you think Trump and Biden are the best America has to offer. I could find more righteous and more intelligent homeless people that would make better leaders.