/u/Leo_Littlebook

/u/JasonCarswell

Part 1- Rant on government PsyOps and Snowden among other crap

---

Before the Edward Snowdon "revelations," James Bamford, an intelligence asset, limited hangout pusher and book peddler "exposed" the NSA's future $2 billion data center which would be used to store:

"...all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital ‘pocket litter.’”

The source for this quote above by the Wire was:

...one unnamed former NSA official... [Fuck you, "he's" anonymous, this isn't a desensitization campaign /s.]

The source states:

“Everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.”

...i.e. "revelations" before the Edward Snowden "revelations" reveal that everyone is a target. Later, I will analyze Bamford's curious connections.

https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/

Narratives like these are always utilized or authored by the intelligence agencies, broadcasted through various mediums to desensitize the public to accept 1984 style surveillance, which, fortunately for them, the people willingly accepted by purchasing their digital devices and using their convenient communication channels. That means you! Yeah you, the one reading this.

These methods can be classified under the Department of Defense's perception management scheme or managing perception through various means, tactics and operations, particularly through limited hangout campaigns.

In the realm of intelligence spooks and psychological operations, Sarah Bajc, the girlfriend of an alleged MH370 victim, believes that MH370 was "kidnapped and is still intact." Maybe she is right—as a conspiracy theoretician mind would want to believe. Maybe this plane was used as the other Malaysian airliner, redressed, that just so happened to fly off course and be "shot down by Russian Separatists" over Ukraine as the official sanctioned story purports—a pretext for various geopolitical agendas. Or maybe, just maybe, there is another reason built into the narrative; a reason not unlike Benghazi mom Pat Smith's cause, that is to acquire answers whilst propagandizing all the cut-and-paste government sanctioned narratives one could think of. Maybe that's it!

For a comparison, here is the broad Pat Smith pleading her case on corporate news, as she often does:

https://invidio.us/watch?v=NSjtdjS5Hoc

Smith says she lost her alleged son in the alleged Benghazi attacks on the convenient date of 9/11/2012.

She reminisced:

Ya know, it's funny, I just realized...

[13 years later? LMFAO.]

...this afternoon that my son, the one...

[The one?]

...that was killed in Benghazi...

[Remember to prepare scheme in perception management accordingly; Smith, "can you do that? Can you please just read the script we give you and not fuck up this time." Said an unnamed former intelligence official familiar with person's thinking.]

...was actually the one...

[Actually the one? But he wasn't but wait for what she says next...]

...that took over the airplanes when they were grounded, when the original 9/11 hit the towers.

[LMFAO! How convenient it is Mrs. Smith that all this is connected, it almost reminds me of Snowdon whose father did DoD backed investigative work on the 9/11 phantom planes which will be further detailed at a later time. Also, a date cannot hit anything; you screwed up your lines.]

What this larp mom is trying to say is that she realized that her "actual" son (the "one" who probably isn't her son and was probably not killed in Benghazi) was also the son who took over the grounded airplanes on 9/11/2001 (probably did not) when the drones hit the towers.

The convenient date of 9/11/2012 intermingled with 9/11/2001 can not be a coincidence.

Clearly she is trying to push the hijacker theory, which is of course a lie, as evidenced by Elias Davidsson and Graeme MacQueen.

This operation is what is called schema in DoD perception management tactics. Watching this interview, it is clear that she is lying and reading a script. And you'd think CNN wouldn't want this women to speak because of her strong distaste for Hillary Clinton but think again. Why? Because it is all theater meant to lead you on wild goose chases when the entire narrative is fabricated including the limited hangout conspiracies they push out. But once you understand all these interviews and events are psyops, then everything makes a lot more sense.

Basically, Smith is tasked with using the schema tactic in perception management, i.e. connecting past propaganda with present propaganda to form a historical lie forever. All you really need is a hobo or an ex. convict who has zero conscious and can do it for a buck. Just give them a script and let them act on TV. Chris Hurst played it well as well as the entire cast, and I mean the entirety of all witnesses and those "injured" at the PULSE Nightclub PsyOp, of whom all just so happened to be ex. convicts out on bond or D-film actors from Pedowood.

And that reminds me of Sarah Bajc who allegedly lost her boyfriend March 8th 2014 in the missing Malaysian phantom plane, who also on her twitter shills the Pulse Nightclub PsyOp. I guess conman and intelligence spooks really do show up in droves to pander to themselves and for those hard to find greenbacks.

So, in conclusion Pat Smith's alleged son who allegedly dies on 9/11/2012 because of lack of security, as Smith contends, was also the guy that just so happened to be in command of the grounded planes on 9/11/2001 for security reasons that Pat Smith only now realized this afternoon, 13 years later.

How people can not see through this stupid psyop and script is beyond me.

So, what does Sarah Bajc have to do with Snowdon?