Why don't you all put your $$$ where your mouth is?

submitted by Lilith_Fair from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tortoise 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Id pay if it was actually uncensored if I had more money.

But, the actual enforcement of a pyramid of debate and banning of nsfw content is a form of censorship, so, while I do think this site is better than reddit by miles, it is also not on a level I would financially support it either.

If they changed their content policy and I had some more money in the future? Sure, maybe I would.

But until then, even once I get a job, I still do not plan on donating.

[–]Lilith_Fair[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I can see your point about pyramid of debate but I don't agree at all with nsfw content. Not because I have issues with nsfw, but because a site having specific purposes as to subject is not in and of itself censorship. If a magazine is a food & dining magazine, it's not censorship if it doesn't contain articles bout cars and automobiles. This site's rule is no porn. In and of itself it is not censorship if that type of content is not covered by the mission of the site.

[–]Tortoise 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Well, than its not covered under the "mission" of what I would consider worth backing.

[–]Lilith_Fair[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And yet you're here.

[–]Tortoise 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, its still far better than reddit.