Here is how I ended up here.

submitted by nihilnashwar from self.whatever

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheBeefBenson 18 insightful - 10 fun18 insightful - 9 fun19 insightful - 10 fun -  (18 children)

Welcome. We've got radical feminists, neo nazis, Christian conservatives and not a lot else. The only thing anyone has in common here is that they're all anti-porn... and they don't employ much nuance when they come to defining it.

I only come here because I'm "gender critical" (from a non ideological standpoint) and was given the impression you didn't have to be a radical feminist to get along in the GC community. This is not the case.

I've go to Ruqqus mostly and it feels like there's less of an extreme there. You do still get people from the fringes but the centre feels a lot more fleshed out there.

[–][deleted]  (17 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

    I completely agree with you. I am a researcher of TRUTH before any ideology. But by researching only pure TRUTH, I found myself becoming a NAZI. I feel that critical thought will do that to anybody who keeps at it.

    Now by Nazi I mean a classical racist, not some dumb jerk who uses the N-word every other sentence, a national socialist, a traditionalist in terms of morality, and a socialist-capitalist (therefore ANTI-COMMUNIST to the utmost) economically. Again, anybody with life experience and a good head on their shoulders, by seeking truth, will arrive at the same destination.

    [–]newguy 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

    What a ridiculous conclusion. "Everyone who searches for truth becomes a Nazi."

    Do you hear yourself? Goodness what a simple-minded thing to say.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    How did I become a Nazi by simply studying and looking for objective truth then? Please, no more ad hominems. There are already too many such comments flying around.

    [–]newguy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    But by researching only pure TRUTH, I found myself becoming a NAZI. I feel that critical thought will do that to anybody who keeps at it.

    Literally you, in the previous post. So I guess that proves it.

    Do you have short term memory loss about your own posts?

    You just have hateful thoughts and you this ideology fits that hate, so you see it as truth.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Ah, the old pot calling the kettle black. I told you: I am and have always been A TRUTH RESEARCHER. Not a "hate adopter" or however you would characterize me.

    But I see you for what you are now: ill faith.

    [–]newguy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You're completely asleep and are putting the world on a war footing by holding such beliefs. You want to destroy humanity, not save it.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Well, you've achieved one thing: me feeling sorry for you. Provided you're white and not a shill.

    [–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    Truth does not have an ideology per ser. You can learn that whites are genetically superior to blacks and it can lead you to the conclusion that they then ought to be slaves to the master race or it could lead you to the conclusion that whites then have the responsibility to take care of blacks or it could lead you to the conclusion that segregation of the races is better etc.

    Facts are not in and of themselves defining for an ideology. One of my problems getting red pilled was the lack of non-alt right perspectives of the red pills or facts.
    But I think social democracy can be just as good an ideology with all the facts in mind. It's the current government of Denmark and one of their ministers cheered this week because we've had so few refugees this year and he also yesterday I believe said that integration has been a tragedy and that it isn't working.

    [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    "Classical racism" is ABSOLUTELY NOT: "Whites are superior to blacks" that is racist prejudice. Classical racism is the mindset that allows one to ask such politically incorrect, yet interesting questions such as: "Why are blacks dominating in sports?" "Why are Asians dominating in manufacturing?" "Why are whites dominating in innovation?" "Why are Jews dominating in subversion and sabotage?", etc. And Nazism is definitely grounded in CLASSICAL racism, not in racist prejudice. Please learn topics before posting about them.

    "Facts are not in and of themselves defining for an ideology." Agreed! Except of course, when said "ideology" is simply the adoption of objective truth. In that one case only, Facts and "ideology" if you wish, meet and are the same!

    Social democracy is great, so long as the civilization (nation, country, whatever) is HOMOGENEOUS. But that's a first-step requirement to achieve it. Look at Norway and Sweden, what's going on there. What is the way to achieve sufficient sociocultural homogeneity? Nazism of course, which is National Socialism. It's literally a Socialist (capitalist socialism, absolutely ANTI-COMMUNIST) nationalist regime. And you can't have the social aspect of it without the nationalist aspect of it first. If most Danes are DANES, then you already have a good part of the nationalism of the national socialists and you can concentrate yourself on the social aspect of this dual view of national priorities.

    You are basically arguing for my position.

    I understand it's infuriating to argue with me. But that's only because I side with objective truth. As such, there is nothing to twist out of shape to fit my "narrative". Just plain facts that nobody can argue around.

    [–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    You can achieve sociocultural homogeneity with social democracy too. We are going in that direction currently in Denmark after having 40 years of going in the multicultural direction. Times are changing.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Not if you don't have enough of it first. Also, Jews will take care of your "democratic sociocultural homogeneity". They will destroy that in no time, the moment they decide to. It cannot be done democratically if these subhuman subversives decide it isn't happening.

    You have to get rid of that scum first and foremost. Otherwise, it's just a matter of when they decide to pull a Sweden / Norway / France / Germany / most of the EU type invasion on you. Right now, they're still focusing on Europe (and other places) as a whole. But once that's done, they will get their claws into your politicians and have them dance to their tune. That's when "surprisingly" and "out of nowhere" politicians will suddenly vote in laws that go against everything the Danish people want. And by the time the people react? The population will be 40% muslim terrorists.

    [–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Sweden is ruined, mixed people everywhere like USA

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    40% muslim? We have ~5% muslim population right now and they're hated as fuck. We get 200 refugees this year and danes are MAD. We don't want this shit.
    We have a political party with a policy that wants to kick out 700k muslims from Denmark that gets ~2% votes. We have ~300k muslims in Denmark. The policies of that party are so far out and absurd. The biggest left wing party in Denmark is anti-immigration now.

    40% muslim terrorists? Bro :)
    People are already reacting now. If they voted in those laws, you wouldn't want to be a muslim in Denmark. 40% would quickly go to 0% if that happend. Muslims are 165 cm tall pussies and Denmark is a very small country with no place to hide.