I've revived r/BanBigMouth here on SaidIt. It's insane that Reddit banned a subreddit dedicated to exposing a cartoon that sexualizes children. I'm taking mod applications.

submitted by [deleted] from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

P is next on the LGBTQ agenda, and it always has been. California is already teaching pedophilia as a "sexual orientation".

Once pedophilia is normalized the Weimar transformation of the United States will finally be complete. Maybe there will even be some brave "doctors" out there pushing degenerate sexual shit on children like Magnus Hirschfeld did. Yes, we burned those books, and we'll fucking burn them again.

The lesson of the past is that you don't have the luxury of being honorable or compassionate when up against opponents that possess neither attribute.

[–]FLCL 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

California is already teaching pedophilia as a "sexual orientation".

Had to look it up. Snopes says it's wrong, but if you keep reading it becomes obvious that it was only wrong pedantically..

Apparently they weren't exactly teaching it as an orientation, but it was extremely inappropriate for school. The bullet point was:

“The practice of pederasty (an older upper class man would make a young free boy his partner and become his mentor) is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad [the Ancient Greek epic poem], and is evidenced to have existed at least 4500 years ago in ancient Egypt.”

Although it might be okay to include in college level academics, it's insane to teach this to kids. It's like planting a seed in a forest and leaving. I don't think pedophelia will ever been normalized. Being able to easily blackmail those in power is too valuable.

And while I don't give a shit what people do to themselves (trans/gay-wise, not pedo), they need to keep it out of the curriculum. And from everything I've ever seen lgbtq doesn't want to be seen anywhere near pedos, do you have any links/evidence that they're advocating for them?

[–]Grateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Snopes is a website created by two people. It started out ok, explaining urban myths but then it veered off course and lost all credibility.

[–]FLCL 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I understand that, but they're providing sources to what they're saying, in this instance. If someone here gave you links and sources backing up what they're saying, I'm guessing you'd believe them also.

Even so, you have to read what they're saying, and do your own thinking. That's why I realized that they weren't exactly telling the truth when put beside what their sources were saying.

[–]Grateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree that one has to do their own thinking.

The problem is when a reference site exhibits bias a few times their credibility is damaged.