all 83 comments

[–][deleted] 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

reddit actually banned that sub? what the fuck? what reason could they possibly have to ban a subreddit for criticizing a show as shitty and gross as big mouth?

[–]Jesus 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

people hijacked it and were making fun of nick kroll and showing his 9/11 connections with his father.

[–]nomad77 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

9/11 connections?

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Jules Kroll controlled the security at the WTC complex when Silverstein privatized it.

If you believe in the 9/11 official government sanctioned fairytale then I won't go any further other than to say Nick Kroll has family connections to some of the 9/11 perps, who were NOT muslims.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

oh

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (29 children)

P is next on the LGBTQ agenda, and it always has been. California is already teaching pedophilia as a "sexual orientation".

Once pedophilia is normalized the Weimar transformation of the United States will finally be complete. Maybe there will even be some brave "doctors" out there pushing degenerate sexual shit on children like Magnus Hirschfeld did. Yes, we burned those books, and we'll fucking burn them again.

The lesson of the past is that you don't have the luxury of being honorable or compassionate when up against opponents that possess neither attribute.

[–]FLCL 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

California is already teaching pedophilia as a "sexual orientation".

Had to look it up. Snopes says it's wrong, but if you keep reading it becomes obvious that it was only wrong pedantically..

Apparently they weren't exactly teaching it as an orientation, but it was extremely inappropriate for school. The bullet point was:

“The practice of pederasty (an older upper class man would make a young free boy his partner and become his mentor) is mentioned in Homer’s Iliad [the Ancient Greek epic poem], and is evidenced to have existed at least 4500 years ago in ancient Egypt.”

Although it might be okay to include in college level academics, it's insane to teach this to kids. It's like planting a seed in a forest and leaving. I don't think pedophelia will ever been normalized. Being able to easily blackmail those in power is too valuable.

And while I don't give a shit what people do to themselves (trans/gay-wise, not pedo), they need to keep it out of the curriculum. And from everything I've ever seen lgbtq doesn't want to be seen anywhere near pedos, do you have any links/evidence that they're advocating for them?

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And while I don't give a shit what people do to themselves (trans/gay-wise, not pedo), they need to keep it out of the curriculum. And from everything I've ever seen lgbtq doesn't want to be seen anywhere near pedos, do you have any links/evidence that they're advocating for them?

Have a few academic articles:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-018-9519-1

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12119-016-9392-8

Have some mainstream press articles:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/ (original sources may have been memoryholed).

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/harvey-milk-stamp-matt-barber-_n_4117311

Through the culture? How about Drag Queen Story hour? How about child drag queens dancing for men in adult gay bars?

How about a TED talk?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egiBgmvv8wA

Maybe the words of the people that started the movements? Look them up individually and see how many supported it. Most did. There used to be a video of a college professor covering this topic, but it's been memory holed. Wanted to pass you the link.

It's one of the final steps in Critical Theory. The Frankfurt School, having been ejected from Germany by the Nazis concocted a plan to destroy the dominant culture and restore the one they so loved.

https://archive.fo/hcNTA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iB6iBh4Ktmv0/ (Documentary about how terrible it was that the Nazis ruined the above "vibrant" place).

We're likely about to have a Hyperinflation crisis. Some days, I feel like we're stuck in a time warp. That or the universe just has a twisted sense of humor.

[–]FLCL 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you, I don't have time to check all these out right now, but I appreciate the research and links

[–]HetIsEw 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

If sNopes says it's a lie, then it's 100% true. Only the morally and mentally weak look to them as any kind of oracle.

[–]FLCL 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one said they're an 'oracle', I'm not sure where you got that from. Did you stop in the middle of the sentence when you saw the word Snopes?

They did however gather info and have sources for it, which is why I said that Snopes was being pedantic when they said that was wrong.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think pedophelia will ever been normalized. Being able to easily blackmail those in power is too valuable.

They still have ritual killing and eating of children for that.

[–]BallBagIsBurning 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A lot of what Snopes claims to debunk relies on pedantics and or semantics. Problem is your average brain dead moron will look, see a big red X and take it as gospel. As you say, if you just read a little further into things, most of the time you'll find that their justification is a very thin veil of an opinion written as fact. Then agai, their opinion as fact is the main strategy of the far lefts programming.

[–]FLCL 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah I can see what your saying from just that article. Their conclusion was entirely pedantic, and just revealed more problems. It's sad people won't read father than the first couple sentences and think for themselves, but I guess that's the problem we're having these days.

[–]BallBagIsBurning 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be fooled, the lack of attention span we find in most people was by design. All so eventually they can just state YES or NO and the masses blindly follow without the need for an explanation.

[–]Grateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Snopes is a website created by two people. It started out ok, explaining urban myths but then it veered off course and lost all credibility.

[–]FLCL 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I understand that, but they're providing sources to what they're saying, in this instance. If someone here gave you links and sources backing up what they're saying, I'm guessing you'd believe them also.

Even so, you have to read what they're saying, and do your own thinking. That's why I realized that they weren't exactly telling the truth when put beside what their sources were saying.

[–]Grateful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree that one has to do their own thinking.

The problem is when a reference site exhibits bias a few times their credibility is damaged.

[–]Lastrevio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh yes we don't need to teach kids about real shit that happens hide the truth from them even if it's bad!!!!

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Look up Alfred Kinsey. He is the father of the modern sexual revolution and he got a bunch of his "scientific data" from pedophiles molesting children. That study allegedly proved that "children are sexual".

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Yes that Kinsey was definitely that influential in bringing these ideas into the mainstream. He was homosexual and possibly a pedophile himself. He hired pedophiles to molest children for his research into child sexuality. Look up "Children of table 34".

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Well, not only was he not locked up, his research was celebrated in the mainstream media and revered as the de facto standard model for studying human sexuality. When some of the kids involved in the research grew up and started talking about how their molestation ended up in these research studies, people had to seriously reevaluate whether Kinsey's work was as noble as everyone made it out to be. Either way, Hollywood still seems to celebrate his ideas on sexuality, maybe unsurprisingly so.

      [–]Countach_3D 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      How the fuck was he not thrown in prison for the rest of his life?

      Because this is all /s/conspiracy hysteria.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexuality#Kinsey

      [–]asterias 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      From a gay parade in Greece a few days ago: LGBTQ scream "we are coming for your children".

      Guess who funds those parades.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Jews.

      [–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      🤮

      [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      It was one of the first actually, at least in the UK. PiE* as it was known was a political activist group that claimed paedophilia was a sexual preference just like homosexuality, and they tried to insert themselves into the growing gay rights movement. And many many leftwing MPs took up their cause and accepted them.

      *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_Exchange

      [–]Wahwah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      They can insist on being a legitimate sexual orientation as much as they want, in fact, I am personally convinced that this is certainly not a rare anomaly since quite a few individuals have paedophilic tendencies.

      However, 1. Children can never give consent, neither are children capable of processing sexuality, even if post-pubescent children are physically capable of sexual exchanges, their minds may not be ready to process that and result in long-term to permanent mental dysfunctions. Age of consent is very important. 2. Children are not a sex, but a group so I wonder how they would manage to fit into the category of sexuality.

      [–]jet199Instigatrix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It's not a sexuality. Its a paraphilia like autogynephilia, voyeurism or exhibitionism. It's a form of sadism in most cases, the vast majority of child porn is torture.

      [–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Holy crap I remember that in the papers when I was a kid.

      Back then my dad was boning a 13yo, and nobody did anything about it. Thank god times change.

      [–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Maybe there will even be some brave "doctors" out there pushing degenerate sexual shit on children

      what is transgenderism?

      [–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      P is next on the LGBTQ agenda, and it always has been.

      One of the original reasons I came to SaidIt was that I was heavily censored by the far left for saying that child pornography should not be banned (I had this view, at the age of 16, because I believe in freedom of speech, expression, and information, and didn't understand that there was such intense opposition to anything related to pedophiles or why anyone would have it, for reasons I still do not understand because people either didn't let me debate about it, or debated the wrong issue in a strawman argument). I have never seen anyone in the mainstream LGBTQ community (the part that likes to censor people) voice anything but heavy opposition to pedophilia. They don't even let people describe it as a sexuality most of the time. This is the intolerant left's opinion on pedophilia. They do not support it, at all. Otherwise, I wouldn't be banned from /r/Anarchism and a few other random subs too.

      [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

      I have a pretty dark sense of humor and I'm not easily shocked. A friend of mine was watching this show and it was just offensive and repulsive. I wouldn't advocate for banning it but it is disgusting how that show sexualizes children. Like, if a child actually watched it, it would be like psychological molestation

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

      For someone who's never watched it, and isn't ever planning to, how exactly does it sexualize children? I keep hearing this so I'd be interested to know what sort of fucked up shit happens.

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      Well, I'm not the best person to ask this, I only caught bits and pieces of one or two episodes. From what I could tell, it was all about putting characters that look like 5 year olds in the most sexually explicit situations possible for the sake of "adult humor". I just found it to be in very poor taste.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Huh. That sounds extremely fucking weird.

      [–]liberty_primer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I watched the whole first season and there’s a scene with a barely pubescent girl talking to her vagina using a mirror. Her vagina talks back to her.

      If it was some disembodied animated vagina talking, I wouldn’t think it was so bad, but it wasn’t. It was attached to a 11-13 year old girl.

      If that’s not sexualizing children I don’t know what is. There’s other examples too. I was sick when I watched it, so my memory is foggy.

      [–]72ndGender 7 insightful - 9 fun7 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 9 fun -  (12 children)

      What are you, some kind of pedophobe? Why do you hate LGBTP people?

      [–][deleted] 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

      fuck yeah. pedophiles can stay as far away from the lgb community as possible.

      [–]72ndGender 4 insightful - 10 fun4 insightful - 9 fun5 insightful - 10 fun -  (7 children)

      Wow, how fucking racist of you.

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      if hating pedophiles makes me a racist then i'm the most racist person on earth

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      Play devil's advocate too many times, and you soon become the devil...

      [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Some people actually couldn't tell I was joking. Ffs...

      [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Poe's Law exists.

      [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Great point.

      [–]HetIsEw 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Then Gary Coleman was a racist because Diff'rent Strokes took an anti-pedo pro-homosexual stance nearly 40 years ago.

      [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      yep, troll. Fuck off back to your cave

      [–]NiceDickBro 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

      Excuse me bigot but we prefer the term MAP!

      [–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I am SO sorry. I'll make a donation to NAMBLA immediately and post about it on social media. Very sorry...

      [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      are you just here to troll?

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 8 fun5 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 8 fun -  (2 children)

      it also has white women voicing black characters, so if they banned that sub it means they support blackface basically.

      [–]aThievingStableboy 4 insightful - 8 fun4 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

      vgasetras

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      White women, really?

      [–]OasisReverie 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who is disgusted by the sexualization of children.

      I thought I was just uncomfortable with the show because of personal reasons. I didn't understand how my close friends could even watch this cartoon. I thought maybe I was weird or prudish for boycotting stuff like this, but I think I'm a sane person in a crazy world.

      [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      Bigmouth is created by Nick Kroll a Zionist Jew whose father worked for Kroll Associates who was part and parcel of the 9/11 false flag event.

      [–]HetIsEw 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

      [–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      /u/magnora7 Evading bans

      [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      FUCK OFF KIKE

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Wow I didn't know all non-Jews = sexual abusers. Who could have thought it.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Oh, the BS is strong in here.

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      Why give this show more attention? They want attention from being disgusting, and for me personally I would've never heard of this show except for the people complaining about it. It's like the Kardashians. Just ignore them and they stop mattering. Just my 2 cents

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      I think deliberately causing outrage was part of the marketing strategy for the show considering how crude it aims to be

      [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Undoubtedly. In fact I'd say that's its only selling point. A point which doesn't appeal to me one iota

      [–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Just ignore the show, just ignore the creep over the street, just ignore the creep next door, nek minnit, your child has some fucker's cock in his arse and you are in jail for 1st degree murder.

      Silence is consent, or so the liberals say.

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      That's quite an extreme leap from a tv show that no one cares much about

      [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      no it isn't. If you have a major broadcaster normalising pedophilia, then you can't just 'ignore it'. The show still exists, is still available for children and perverts to view, and changes the nature of our shared reality.

      Unless you are happy to ignore the creeping acceptance of pedophiles and the threat they present to your children, hence the analogy

      [–]Tubfloater 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The show has some very funny moments. For the record, I wasn’t attracted to kids before watching the show, nor after. I also wasn’t pro-pedo before and I’m still not. Bunch of whack jobs making something out of nothing.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Well, I often think Reddit targeted feminist subs and subs that are anti porn because porn is their bread and butter.

      [–]Moirawr 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I was curious about that community so I checked it out, but it seemed to be another sub harping about Jewish conspiracies. All types of men all over the world want to fuck children, Jewish men aren’t unique in that regard. Was my impression wrong or will this be another (((DA JOOZ))) subreddit?

      *after scrolling through the comments I guess I was right lol. Lots of people would be happy to take down pedophilia with you if it wasn’t always tied to Jewish conspiracies. Think about your goals. Do you want the show taken down, or do you wanna create endless permutations of the same rejected discussion?

      [–]itsoktobewhite 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      They are jews so its allowed.

      [–]aThievingStableboy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

      asetsaer

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

      reddit recently banned a ton of subs, primarily "hate" subs. i have no clue why this one was banned.

      [–]aThievingStableboy 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (7 children)

      avsetawets

      [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

      got it. big mouth is a show on netflix that features children masturbating and engaging in sexual acts. it's pretty fucking gross. but for some reason it has a massive following.

      [–]aThievingStableboy 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

      vsgetast

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      agreed.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Whoa. There are no words...

      [–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      what on earth? Its on netflix? gross AF. I guess once the Obamas were involved we should have known.

      I don't have streaming subscriptions so miss all that stuff

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      i agree, it's disgusting. but what do the Obamas have to do with it? the show came out in 2017, Obama wasn't the president anymore at that time lol

      [–]theFriendlyDoomer 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm probably on like 5 FBI lists already, don't need to add pedo shit.

      Not my proudest hitting of the smiley face, but here we are.

      [–]TimeFlies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Did they warn the mods beforehand? I know that subreddit had some issues with straight anti-semitism (loooota "nose" jokes for example), but admins should give a chance to clean up instead of insta-ban. The topic wasn't anti-semitic or hateful. Guess we've been shown time-and-again where Reddit admins' sympathies lie vis-a-vis pedo content though.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I’ll mod

      [–]Lastrevio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      What's wrong with sexualizing children in a cartoon? They are fictional characters, not real people.