verifying NAB d3rr

submitted by [deleted] from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'd be fine with that, sounds like a good solution. I guess it doesn't need to be on our main server, probably for the better it's not, now that you mention it.

Can it not share a server with one of our lowest-used servers though? Surely one of the two cheap ones we have could also handle the nab mirroring software in addition to what it's already doing? Or maybe we could test that out before we go disabling any existing features?

Like maybe we could put it on the IRC server, get nab running, and then turn the IRC back on to see if it can handle both? That'd save us $5/mo, which is $60/year so might be worth it

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

yeah, we could put it on the IRC server. the only issue is that it's setup to skip CloudFlare because we thought about launching external IRC client access. if we put that on hold, we can give the server and the NAB instance CloudFlare protection/CDN which I believe he's using on the main nab, and it'd be desirable. this also hides the real ip aside from it being public now :)

a similar approach is to put IRC onto TheLounge server, giving up on external IRC clients, and spinning up a fresh server and ip for the nab instance.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

he says the database is 10GB that he needs to port over, so we have space for that on the IRC server and then some, right?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

yep, i think we have plenty

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cool, good deal.