I'm going to take a closer look. But a quick scan of the video got me this:

"global warming is a religion, like when the Catholic Church says the world is not round"

They never said that. Why would I believe a Nobel laureate if he not only gets such a basic fact wrong but goes on to use it as a polemic argument. I mean, he's a Nobel laureate and should know much better than being so sloppy.

I immediately assume he's just as sloppy with the rest of his arguments.