you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The short answer is. . .it's not science. It's the religious tenets of Dogmatic Scientism masquerading as proven scientific principles. You can easily tell the difference by how angry people get when you question them.
If you said "gravity is fake" then I could just drop the mic, and prove you wrong without a word.
If I said vaccine injury is real and has already happened to people you know and love, and you call me an anti-vaxxer instead of arguing the point, then we know which side your bread is buttered on.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If I said vaccine injury is real and has already happened to people you know and love,

Really? Who are those people?

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Anyone you know who has had the jab, and is either no longer living, or no longer as healthy as they were before. In every case, the vaccine is the prime suspect until conclusively ruled out via autopsy or other investigation. It's far less scientific to conclude, without evidence, as they so often do, that these injuries and deaths are "not vax related."

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone you know who has had the jab, and is either no longer living, or no longer as healthy as they were before.

What happens if I know people who haven't had the jab and are either no longer living, or no longer as healthy as they were before?