Pfizer fires whistleblower who leaked COVID emails to Project Veritas.

submitted by [deleted] from (gvid.tv)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Everything she reported is already old news in other versions of their serums.

You use human cells to see what something will do when injected into a human. It's not an "other version of their serums" thing, it's simply a step that you would take. Especially with an mRNA vaccine, that needs to do its thing in a human cell.

This isn't red meat for the pubic to push back against.

I'm not familiar with the metaphor here. Do the public push back against red meat?

It's a beef human jerky rawhide for the MSM to pretend at controversy.

It's one of those human cell lines that you can buy for medical research. Originally harvested back in the 1950s. It's not rawhide. It's not jerky. It's a cell line.

But it's also a defiler's confession.

"Defiler"? How so?

This way they can someday morally claim the public knew what they were accepting into their bodies.

The vaccine doesn't have human cells in it. It's just tested on a human cell line.

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You use human cells to see what something will do when injected into a human.

They've been using fetal tissue (lung cells IIRC) to culture other human serums.
The Catholic Church acknowledges this, strongly indicating this is a fact.

They supposedly filter out cellular components, and whatnot. This still contains human proteins, etc.

The "filtered" argument is fairly weak.
Let someone make a serum with dog poo, and argue that the solution is "filtered".

Injecting this mystery material bypasses all of the normal biological defense systems.

The filtered cellular lung poo is within you. Defiled.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

They've been using fetal tissue (lung cells IIRC) to culture other human serums.

Okay. For what purpose?

The Catholic Church acknowledges this, strongly indicating this is a fact.

Really? I would've though that Pfizer would be a better source of information about what Pfizer are producing than the catholic church. The Catholic church won't even say what the Catholic church are up to with respect to money laundering and raping children. They're not an especially compelling indication of fact.

They supposedly filter out cellular components, and whatnot. This still contains human proteins, etc.

Plausible. They're a pharmaceutical company. Human proteins would be the ones you'd use to treat a human. Do you know which products?

The "filtered" argument is fairly weak.

What is it arguing?

Let someone make a serum with dog poo, and argue that the solution is "filtered".

What?

1) Dog poo doesn't make a serum.
2) The issue with injecting dog poo is that it's going to be contaminated with bacteria and possibly other pathogens.
3) A human cell line isn't contaminated with bacteria or other pathogens.
4) I presume they're not straining it through filter paper when they filter it. There'll be a biochemical process that isolates the desired proteins.

Injecting this mystery material bypasses all of the normal biological defense systems.

What is the product that is derived from this lung tissue?

The reason I ask is because I'm not clear on where is it injected, what it treats, or why and how it bypasses "normal biological defense systems". ... By which you mean the immune system?

The filtered cellular lung poo is within you. Defiled.

Okay. So you think lung tissue is contaminated with bacteria and pathogens in the same way as faeces, and so it's defiled.

You might be mistaken. Faeces is waste material from an animal. A cell line of fetal lung tissue isn't. It's living cells.

To be fair, you're drawing a pretty long bow to get from embryonic cell line to dog faeces. They're very dissimilar.

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Using fetal material of any source, as an ingredient, for any reason, is vile beyond description.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Using fetal material of any source, as an ingredient, for any reason, is vile beyond description.

"Ingredient" probably isn't correct. They're probably isolating a protein generated by the cell, not that is part of the cell. But it's difficult to discuss when you haven't said what it is that you're talking about: What is the product that is derived from this lung tissue?

And "Fetal material" isn't correct. The cell line has been grown for decades in labs. The original cells were isolated from an embryo, but those cells are long gone.

And I don't follow "is vile beyond description". I understand why we are ethically bound to not hurt people, and even help them if we can. But most pregnancies end in miscarriage. Why the fuck should it matter if some of those cells are used to help people?

Can you get me to understand why it is "vile beyond description"?

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Can you get me to understand why it is "vile beyond description"?

Injecting this chimera sauce, into young children who cannot consent...

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Re: "chimera sauce".

What is the product that you're taking about that is being injected into young children?

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm bored of your pharma shillery.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So there's some medical intervention that treats or cures some disease or disorder, but you don't know what.

It's given to non-consenting children, but you can't say how.

Its "vile beyond description", but it doesn't hurt anyone.

And anyone trying to find out what it is your fucking taking about, is boring and a pharma shill?

Oookay.

Oh, and it's "Chimera sauce". You may mean something by that, but fuck me for wondering what, right?

[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but you can't say how.