you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Sure.

Well, many others are making these exact same arguments somewhere, except replace "black" with "goy", and "white" with "jew".

Supposedly, the math works out the same.

Don't take my word for it.

Count the % of billionaires, professionals (doctors, lawyers, not so many clergy (Joel Osteen and others are suspect), and ivy league attendance. I could go on.

Do you accept this logic?

It's a tired old argument. The English ruling class made the same case against the Scottish, and the Irish.
While conveniently ignoring their position of relative power, and also ignoring that they have their own slums, which are full of similarly disadvantaged English (poor, violent, socially crude). As an example, cockney was an servant class subculture. It's fashionable today.

Does anyone still believe the English are superior to the Scottish, or Irish, or cockney Londoners?

The British haven't undergone any evolutionary advancements in the last 150 years that advanced their whiteness, so something else has clearly changed.

Anyone making this argument today will get laughed out of the room; cause it's stupid.

However, the same fraudulently quantifiable argument is fabricated relative to black people in the US.

Allegedly, it's being pushed to support their position of perceived superiority.

Functionally, it's being used as a divide and conquer weapon against the white population.

Ultimately, it's a matter of power. It's a divide and conquer strategy that leverages socioeconomic assumptions, and people's limited perceptions.

The moral majority of "whites" refused to accept the violence against the blacks during the civil rights movement.
Although, Johnson had conflicting and loyalties. As did others such as [Malcom X](tinyurl.com/17wnz3qg), etc.

200 years ago every major european city had a jewish their, which had the same problems of poverty, violence, etc. and jewish "haves vs. have-nots".
One interesting difference was the jewish ghettos were self-enforced, which is unusual, but was fine for various reasons.
This was yet another divide and conquer strategy.

Then some of the clever Jewish exploiters; exploited an opportunity, and gained incredible wealth overnight.

These clever and opportunistic Jews began discreetly promoting their own "ethnic" group to positions of wealth, and power.

And you probably know the revised history of what happened after that.

Does anyone believe that there was an evolutionary advancement among the global jewish population???

It's absurd.

What has changed is who has money, and power.

One last thought to close the loop. Here's a video which briefly mentions an image of a one thousand year old silver coin. The masters of money two-headed eagle symbol on one side.

Does anyone believe the jewish leadership actually controlled all of the world during the dark ages, and pu pretended to live in ghettos, or worse?

Or is it more likely that the ones who control money and power recently (200-300 yrs ago) decided to lend their power to support a handful of jewish elite who are advance an older agenda?

Redpilled.

[–]ReSegreto 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Well,hindsight is always 13/50.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well,hindsight is always 13/50.

So, your saying that you have to stand within 13' of a sign to read letters that most others could read at 50'?

You're close to blind.

[–]ReSegreto 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Swing and a miss,fren.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I hit it out of the park.

You need glasses.

[–]ReSegreto 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ok,boomer.