you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Thanks for sharing this website, which I had not seen. What a shit show of lies in every post.

I see that it was begun by a QAnon conspiracy nut (bikergang_accountant) at VOAT. I suppose this and PARLER have become crazier alaternatives to Fox, Sinclaire and Murdoch. Why are so many Americans so gullible?

EDIT: And if you want to see hararssment, see what's happened to this Dem. in the Georgia Senate:

Even Repuglicans in Georgia are receiving death and rape threats (against their children) regarding the their roles in the vote counting process. The GOP have created monsters that are making America very un-American.

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

It isn't the GOP that has created monsters.

It is un-American to not protect the citizens right to vote and be ignorant so as to say that they see no fraud.

I don't believe that she should be threatened, but that could be a new cnn tactic for all that we know. Its probably been debunked already.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Holy mackerel - the mental gymnastics you have to do in order to continue believing in nonsense. It's not that complicated

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Repeat that to yourself, as its more fitting there. Insulting my intelligence without any other counter, demonstrates the lack of your own.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

'Mental gymnastics' is not necessarily a critique of intelligence.

It is however a critique of knowledge and sanity.

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You must be a shill or incompetent. Hell, perhaps from China if you can't understand why we should be guaranteed a fair election.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You do realize, hopefully, that I am not arguing against a fair election.

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You bury any arguments, so I dont trust any posts from you. You pin GOP as monsters while many in or supporting the democratic party has perpetrated fraud upon the nation. Very biased and backwards if you believed in a fair election.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK, ChillyChill, if you consider the dead people and hackers and corrupt ballot box stuffers who voted for both candidates (because there is the potential for those kinds of votes, thanks to the damn electronic machines), you still have to count an overwhelming majority for one candidate for that person to win. Biden won by 7.06 million votes and 72 electoral votes. Even if some of those votes are questionable, how do you explain the millions of additional votes?

[–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"...making America very un-American."

The big-picture debate that is going on today is what does it mean to be "American"? There are at least two very different pictures of what that word means. Each side is saying the other is violating the norm, and each norm seems to have about 70 million supporters behind it. Lots of monsters on all sides...

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But both sides do not take equally 'American' positions.

One 'side' favours autorcatic rule and the continance of 99% production and profits ot the 1%

One 'side' favors democratic rule, whereby the 99% have more control over what they earn. This is obviously the side that favors America, the American dream, the American way, and Americans.

[–]whistlepig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Definitely insulting, but harassment is an awfully strong and misleading term for what most of us would just define as "criticism" and "ridicule"

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If I edit your Wikipedia page in order to make you look like a corrupt idiot, is that just ridicule? Is that how we're supposed to criticise public servants now?

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think editing the page was stupid and unfair. However, there is no proof that this was from GOP. There has been a pattern of folks calling Republicans extremists when in fact, the left have been more aligned as such.

I'd bet more money that antifa, blm, or "Ms Ruby" defaced her page.

[–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The issue here is harrassment vs. 'criticism' & 'ridicule'.

It's obvious who is motivated to harass the Dem. elected official.