you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yishengqingwa666 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Men hate women. Left and right wing men will endlessly argue over how best to place the boot on women's neck.

Left wing men see women as public property. Right wing men see women as private property.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Are you insane? In the West, outside of impossible corner cases like psychopathic serial killers, there is literally no evidence - whatsoever - that anyone of any consequence, anywhere, hates women.

This is the civilization that conditioned the vote on military service, but then gave it to women just because they complained.

This is the civilization that for centuries lived by the “women and children first” credo in situations like the Titanic.

This is the civilization that gives women the following choices in the event of an unwanted pregnancy: unilaterally kill the child, give the child to someone else and walk away consequence-free, or identify any man you want on the birth certificate and after a summary hearing, collect 1/3 of his income for “child support” that you have no obligation whatsoever to spend on the child. In the same situation, our patriarchy has given men one choice: shut up and pay or go to prison. Oh, and if a man experiences financial loss and can’t pay, that’s often not a defense. Neither is being the victim of rape by the mother as a child.

This is the civilization that has conjured a rape “epidemic” out of ridiculous studies that would not pass a Freshman research methods class to conclude with a straight face that Western college campuses are more dangerous for women than Third World nations with dysfunctional rule of law. In the name of this issue, the Obama DOE at Biden’s behest (both men for those of you keeping score) required colleges and universities to institute a parallel quasi criminal justice system with essentially no due process rights for accused male students, administered by employees “trained” by feminist academics and consultants. And all this was done to protect the right of students to equal access to education on the basis of sex.

This is the civilization that required Harvard and VMI to go co-ed, but not Wellesley or Smith.

This is the civilization that doles out tax breaks and government contracts to business that are owned by women, but also requires all citizens to be given the equal protection of the laws.

This is the civilization that requires men to register for military conscription with dire punishment if they don’t, but allows women the “choice” to enlist or not as they might prefer.

This is the civilization that sentences men to prison time that is an order of magnitude longer for the same offense for which a woman is sentence under the same circumstances. Incidentally, this disparity is far more stark than the black/white sentencing disparity that has convinced most of society that the criminal justice system is racist.

This is the civilization in which men constitute the overwhelming majority of homeless, prison inmates, workplace fatalities, and victims of violent crime including homicide.

This is the civilization that shovels the equivalent of a wealthy country’s GDP into the coffers of feminist organizations that do nothing except spread specious complaints about “sexism” and generate misleading studies used to gain political and economic advantage for women.

I could go on, but instead I’d love to hear a logical explanation of how the patriarchal overlords of the West, who evidently hate women, decided to do these things consistently with their misogynistic impulses. And please no tortured, grasping “deconstruction” imported from your gender studies syllabus revolving around selective subjective interpretation of free goodies as “benevolent sexism” or somehow consistent in your own mind with stereotypical sex roles.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Plenty of people have a hatred of women, plenty of people have a hatred of men.

That's life, people are arseholes, people generalise whole groups, it's a thing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Funny, in my entire life I have neither met nor even heard of a single example of that in the West. I’ve never heard the phrase “I hate women.” Not in person, not on social media, not in academic courses. Never.

Even if there was some evidence of that, the statement was “men hate women.” As in, all of them. All men. Hate all women. That is an insane statement.

I support the right to free speech, even on behalf of second wave lunatics still bandying about last season’s flavor of Leftist persecution complex and hysteria who are only here because they now find themselves alongside whites, men, straight people, and conservatives out of fashion with the whims of the mob. In a perfect world it would be great if she could have realized that theres a common thread through the abuse by corporate censorship, abuse by the trans community, and their own patently irrational beliefs called identity politics. But since that seems off the table the next best thing is show their ideas to the rest of the community for what they are.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You aren't proving anything here accept conformation bias and that you like moving the goalposts.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you sure? The original statement to which I responded was “men hate women.” As in, all men hate all women. That’s literally what I was responding to. I pointed out several examples of systemic bias in favor of women which would not exist if the leadership of society, which includes many men, hated them.

You replied, “arseholes hate other people. It happens.” You revised the original issue “do all men hate all women” to “sometimes some people hate other people” which had virtually nothing to do with the subject at hand. So if anyone is guilty of moving the goalposts, it’s you.

Also, please explain how my statements aren’t proof against the original assertion, as it was made.

Or, continue to drop stupid one liners and I’ll let you have the last word rather than continue to waste time on a troll.