all 45 comments

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

She has it backwards...The Yugoslavian National Army was a communist army - notice the red commie star..... The war in former Yugoslavia was mostly just a continuation of a 500 year old culture struggle and a response to to a power vacuum made as the Communist regime lost its legs...

Through out Europe (east and west Germany, Czechoslovakia and so on) made the transition from Communism to Capitalism in a peaceful manner....

What is coming for the people in US is a straight up October revolution 2.0 and the same tribe who led the Communist party in Russia in 1917 is now in charge in the US..The result will be the same, millions of dead including many members of the tribe as well

[–]Canbot 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We read all the time how during revolutions teachers and professors are lined up and shot en mass. We clearly see how today the schools are used by the elite to brainwash the youth. It has become clear that the text books have left out WHY the propagandists were lined up and shot. I take a bit of solace knowing that so many people see the media, the tech giants, and the education system for the propagandists they are. I will certainly be making sure no one forgets.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]kokolokoNightcrawler 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    White people who refuse interracial and homosexual marriages will be sent to the camps because they are racist/sexist.

    [–]hajamieli[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The good side is that afterwards communists or socialists will be the #1 demonized group over selectively just national socialists and will never rise again. The bad side is that a world war will be fought with US divided or joining socialist causes, and therefore everything they've protected against tyranny will lose their protection and will have to fend for themselves. Russia for one will make huge land grabs in Europe and they don't have to pretent to do it for the people anymore, and China will do the same in Asia.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You're right, and to expound further, many of the countries that transitioned in a "peaceful manner" usually still placed the communist leaders/families who were ruling before into positions of leadership/advisory in the newly transitioned government/society. They did this in Romania for example in the late 80's/ early 90's (and I know this for a fact, as it's where half of my family is from), and each election cycle, the blood, or friends of the blood that ran the prior communist regime are elected into power 'democratically' in the 'capitalist society', to this day - it's literally the same group and lineage of people running the country, the country is just ran differently now. I'm pretty sure the same thing is going on in Hungary as well.

    What is coming for the people in US is a straight up October revolution 2.0 and the same tribe who led the Communist party in Russia in 1917 is now in charge in the US..The result will be the same, millions of dead including many members of the tribe as well

    Anyone curious about this statement should really watch this video featuring ex-KGB Yuri Bezmenov (if you haven't already): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA

    Great comment btw.

    [–]kokolokoNightcrawler 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They did this in Romania for example in the late 80's/ early 90's (and I know this for a fact, as it's where half of my family is from), and each election cycle, the blood, or friends of the blood that ran the prior communist regime are elected into power 'democratically' in the 'capitalist society', to this day - it's literally the same group and lineage of people running the country, the country is just ran differently now. I'm pretty sure the same thing is going on in Hungary as well.

    Wow

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    The Americans that need to listen have their fingers in their ears while chanting today's mantra.

    [–]soundsalad 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Most already know that the common enemy is the government, not another person with different color skin. They can't pull this shit anymore with the internet.

    [–]hajamieli[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    No, in a free society exercising democracy, the goverment is the common friend and representative of the mojority. It's only the outcast who think it's the enemy. The point of democracy is protection from the tyranny of the few. Its opposite is apartheid and such, where the minority either holds majority of the power or is otherwise overrepresented.

    [–]soundsalad 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    No, you're wrong, by definition. Terrorism is using coercion or force to achieve a political goal, and thus, any person or entity that claims by law the authority to tell you what you can or cannot do with your body, mind, and production, is literally by definition a terrorist, as laws are political goals.

    All laws aside from those protecting you or your property from aggression and force are by definition inherently violent laws. If you don't have the right to do whatever you want with your body, mind and money (as long as you don't initiate aggression against another person or their property), then you are a slave. And no one in the world has complete self-autonomy.

    Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is the slight majority violently imposing their will on the slight minority. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what's for lunch. Democracy may be the best system we've got, but it's certainly not freedom.

    [–]Breadman 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (41 children)

    Americans have more to fear from landlord parasites, than mythical reds under the beds

    [–]Canbot 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

    Wow, that is the most despicable thing anyone can think. Imagine working your whole life, sacrificing vacations, luxuries, and time to scrape together enough of a nest egg to retire. Because you came from poverty you don't have the knowledge or skills or youth to start a business venture with any chance of success. The only investment available to you is either the corrupt and manipulated stock market or real estate. You buy the only fixer upper you can afford and put your blood and sweat into fixing it up. Into your old age you keep working to fix every little issue that comes up with it while your tenants, who decided long ago that they would never be such fools as to work as hard as you to maintain a property, carelessly destroy everything because they aren't the ones who have to fix it.

    Then one day the commie scum convince your lazy tenants that not only are they poor because of you, but that you are evil for having the audacity to charge rent for the house you bought with a lifetime of work, fixed up with back breaking labor, and maintain with all your free time. And just like in Bolshevik Russia, they murder you. Having never done a decent thing in their lives they feel they are better than you. That they deserve everything you worked your life to achieve. That somehow their worthless, lazy, good for nothing existence is just as worthy of your wealth as yours.

    Read up on history to see just how absolutely vile the "mythical" reds really are.

    [–]Breadman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Buyer beware.

    Just because it took a lot of effort to become a parasite, doesn’t mean landlording is suddenly morally permissible.

    [–]flugegeheimen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Parasites who want to take someone's property for free believe that charging money for usage of the said property is morally impermissible.

    [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Your property is only your property, because the government says that it is your property.

    Land isn’t created by humans, and so no human has a moral claim to it. Only a legal claim.

    [–]flugegeheimen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    You don't have to create something to have a moral claim to it.

    [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Depends on whether your moral system appreciates parasitic behaviour or not, I suppose

    [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

    Buyer beware.

    Just because it took a lot of effort to become a parasite, doesn’t mean landlording is suddenly morally permissible.

    [–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

    The ultimate irony is that people like you will call landloarding parasitism but welfare is somehow not. Shoe on head retarded.

    [–]just_lesbian_things 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Isn't welfare theoretically supposed to be temporary?

    [–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Ok, let's start by making it actually temporary.

    [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    Welfare is parasitism, and so is landlording.

    & given that welfare recipients typically spend 70%+ of their welfare checks on rent, that makes landlords the bigger parasites

    [–]Canbot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    Voluntary associations and agreements are by definition not parasitism. Welfare is NOT voluntary to the person who is paying for it. That is why it is parasitism. No one is forcing anyone to pay rent. Go live in a tent, or an RV.

    [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Housing is an essential good, so it’s not voluntary. To live in a tent or in an RV, you still need to live at the good graces of a landlord of some description

    Demanding something merely on the basis of law, rather than mutual exchange is parasitic. Landlords do not create land

    [–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    To live in a tent or in an RV, you still need to live at the good graces of a landlord

    There is a world of difference between a homeowner and the state. If you are lumping both together you are doing it to make some kind of bullshit claim. You don't pay rent to anyone when you live in a tent on public land. It just isn't true that there is no where for you to live rent free. That is the implied claim you are making to justify your animosity towards landlords. It is an untrue claim that you have been brainwashed with.

    [–]Breadman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Homeownership is a function of the state. Who do you think enforces and writes property laws? Santa?

    [–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    My local rabbi!

    [–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Ok

    [–][deleted]  (18 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

      ? And if one can’t afford to buy a property?

      Duh?

      [–][deleted]  (16 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

        "The landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for the natural produce of the earth." - (Adam Smith, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 44.)

        [–][deleted]  (8 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

          You can’t say that about goods that are created through hard work, or skill.

          That’s the point Adam Smith was making when he said ‘reap what they have never sowed’

          [–][deleted]  (6 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

            Still doesn’t address the point about moral claims to goods that are created rather than merely possessed

            [–][deleted]  (4 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

              I think landlorld means literally the owner of land in this quote, unless you believe that all properties people rent are created by Nature.

              And it is, full quote:

              As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce. The wood of the forest, the grass of the field, and all the natural fruits of the earth, which, when land was in common, cost the labourer only the trouble of gathering them, come, even to him, to have an additional price fixed upon them. He must then pay for the licence to gather them; and must give up to the landlord a portion of what his labour either collects or produces. This portion, or, what comes to the same thing, the price of this portion, constitutes the rent of land, and in the price of the greater part of commodities makes a third component part.

              [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

              Correct, and?

              [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

              And it doesn't apply to landlords who rent out houses or apartments, for example.

              [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              Adam Smith wasn’t referring only to literal fruits of the earth

              [–]flugegeheimen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              You cold claim it with your out of context quote, sorry for breaking your shilling routine. Next time try with something less googlable.

              [–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

              They are not mythical, and they are all over TV, not hidden under anyone's bed. The leaders of blm, antifa, and intersectional feminism all proudly proclaim their adherence to communist theory and their intent to bring the US under communist rule. You are just running interference for them.

              [–]Breadman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              In the US communism is about the weakest ideology there is. Never going to be a threat. Worry about your own govt, more of a threat