/u/majnora7

Lincoln was allegedly murdered by a 33 degree freemason, a confederate, connected to the Italian Carbonari mafia who loathed the abolitionists. Though, his brother also happened to save Lincoln prior to his alleged assassination from being hit by a train. Just a coincidence, I think not. Lincoln was a racist as well and could care less about slavery ending, it had more to do with the increase in technological means which overtook labor. The bankers used Lincoln as their agent and if he could be the man to end slavery the majority would cheer for the man who spit on the constitution and destroyed the country.

Lincoln was after all hated by Jacksonians, the confederates, and Freemasons. Andrew Jackson was a freemason himself who was stauncly against the chartering of a central bank. The anti-masonic party, pro-aristocratic whigs, of which Lincoln was a member were for a centralized banking scheme, authoritarian, big government, and permanent public and national debt, also too, with a heavy tax burden due to interest. Greenbacks backed by debt bonds were needed to set the stage for the FED.

If anything, Lincoln was no use to the bankers, so they ousted him. But he was their man for histories sake. He is hailed as a lyal man to our liberties today, but his policies and the reconstructionists who supported him as well as the new Frankfurt school of bankers (not the Rothschilds), such as J. P. Morgan, did just the opposite. Ask why Hamilton is also held in high regard today.

The civil war was NOT fought over slavery but between to rival banking sects. The British bankers and new Frankfurt school of bankers. The latter one, and in their imposition of centralizatiom and banking shchemes they effectively incorporated the country and annulled the constitution for citizens, ridding of allodial title. But they said, "hey look, we are not the British, so please don't be mad that we are spitting on the constitution and wrecking your country."