Abby Martin & Lowkey - A Deeper Look at the UK Election (50:07) ~ Empire Files, 2019-12-23

submitted by JasonCarswell from self.ukpolitics

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Commies killed 100 million last century. Forgive me if I don't want that repeated.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That's a fact jack. On one side. At least. Mao = 100m. Stalin = 20m in WWII + 20 more after.

How many did Western capitalism kill?

Add up the world wars, atom bombs, declared wars, undeclared wars, Operation Gladio A+B+C, The Phoenix Program, Tuskeegee and MK Ultra and countless other experiments, invasions, uprisings, coup d'états, proxie wars, interventions, non-interventions (Rwanda, etc), sanctions, poverty, vaccinations, bad medicines, bad policies, prison population deaths, farcical drug wars, uncounted civilian casualties, uncounted "enemy combatants", collateral damage, toxic pollution, etc etc etc.

Easily matched.

Q: And who are our "enemies" now?

A: Any country without a central bank under (((our))) control. (ie. Syria, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, etc etc etc)

Join or die. You will be assimilated.

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Western capitalism kill

None by design. Unlike Marxism.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Oops, we killed hundreds of millions, but not on purpose so it's okay. L. O. L.

I guess you're correct and you're on the "good" side and there is no reason to resist the ruling class who orchestrates both "sides".

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Cars kill people but they're not designed to. The problem with Marxism is that it's a requirement to kill people. You can't avoid the authoritarianism. To those who don't want this your only solution is the pits. Read your history.

The actual problems are due to unprincipled new liberalism. It's a Ferengi philosophy of profits over everything else. We have all the laws on the books already to deal with this but no one with balls to enforce any of it. I assume you think Sanders might but he can't even stand up for himself when the DNC and Hillary attack him.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The problem with Marxism is that it's a requirement to kill people.

Utter nonsense.

Authoritarianism, maybe, depends.

Eugenics is the only dogma that requires murder.

Laws, written by the ruling class, don't count for much without enforcement.

You assume a lot.

Sanders was chickenshit in 2016 when it actually counted. How will he be any different this time?

Also, fuck Hillary, the DNC, and the GOP.

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Authoritarianism

You can't escape it bro. The only answer is classical liberalism which recognizes that there is no utopia. All we can do is make systems which are less shit than before. It's the journey, not the destination.

Also, fuck Hillary, the DNC, and the GOP.

Agreed.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Commies are far from the only authoritarians.

Totalitarianism or Inverted-Totalitarianism = same shit, just different ways of keeping it shitty.

Minarchism, IMO is the best way. I'd say anarchism, but that leave everyone free to organize into their own tribes and then do evil tribe things - so some kind of minarchy - or decentralized minarchies - are necessary.