all 8 comments

[–]IkeConn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Under developed sex organs would be a problem. So gay boys take puberty blockers and instead of having an 8 inch penis when they hit puberty they have a pathetic baby dick. Thanks mom and dad.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

They don't hit puberty, is the thing. They never develop the gonads at all. The body stays childlike, which is good for the groomers who want to fuck child-looking-adults, but it means they never get the critical bone development, they never get the ability to enjoy sex, and they never develop a sex drive or interest in romance at all.

But hey, at least the people most likely to be bamboozled into thinking some kind of a way look like children and can't get pregnant! ಠ_ಠ

the only positive is they are also removed from the gene pool, and that's another human rights violation

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They certainly keep the girls childlike, they stunt growth in girls.

However in boys the make them much taller, you don't really look childlike when you are 6'5" no matter how little your dick is.

Like this huge guy who went through the whole dutch protocol as a child.

https://www.eonline.com/amp/news/1114437/youtuber-nikkietutorials-reflects-on-growing-up-transgender-in-first-interview-since-coming-out

No way is he ever going to pass as either a child or a woman in real life.

And so many delusional trans people think giving kids puberty blockers will make kids pass better but height is one of the main sex tells. They don't even work in regards to what troons want to achieve.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I never heard of that person and the fluff piece you linked says nothing about his medical history. I also had a quick search and found nothing about it affecting boys so that it increases their height (girls though for sure it does*n't). I found one thing on a zoo website talking about possibly affecting long bone end closure in cats and that it may vary by species.

I actually looked for a few minutes and found nothing related, and it's also counterintuitive, which sets off my BS detector. Unless you can find something better than a picture of a crazy person standing next to a crazy person, I'm gonna have to throw a flag on that claim.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, you think you'll find anything helpful on google about this?

https://genderanalysis.net/2019/12/recent-progress-in-height-management-for-trans-adolescents/

You are wrong about girls.

Previous studies were all on kids with precocious puberty (before the age of 9) and blockers do work to increase height in those kids as stunted growth is one of the outcomes of that conditions.

In older girls who decide they are trans, and would have had normal puberty and height, growth is stunted. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9218463/Puberty-blockers-impair-height-growth-bone-density-data-reveals.html

The fact is these kids are being experimented on and the results are only just starting to come in.

Right now the best way to see what the effects are is to find kids who have been through the protocol and judge it with your own eyes.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They don't hit puberty, is the thing. They never develop the gonads at all. The body stays childlike...it means they never get the critical bone development, they never get the ability to enjoy sex, and they never develop a sex drive or interest in romance at all.

That's supposed to be a bad thing?

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Bad is a relative thing

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All that crap pretty much ruined my life.