Mozilla Firefox: "All extensions disabled due to expiration of intermediate signing cert"
submitted 4 years ago by sawboss from (news.ycombinator.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HorseMeat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (16 children)
If you are using Tor Browser, you should use this temporary fix:
In about:config change xpinstall.signatures.required from true to false. This will allow you to use the addons bundled with the Tor Browser until a fix arrives.
[–]happysmash27 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (15 children)
Same with most Linux distributions of Firefox as well as Waterfox and probably Palemoon.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (14 children)
What is the point of these Firefox derivatives if they are phoning home to Mozilla about your extensions every 24h just like Firefox?
[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (13 children)
They changed other things in the browser. Not every derivative has to be perfect. Although… Waterfox does claim "no telemetry".
I don't think this bug is due to phoning home, though. I think it's just bog-standard certificate expiration, that's only checked once every 24 hours.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (12 children)
Checking every 24 hours is phoning home? They are monitoring me to ensure I haven't installed any non-signed Add Ons.
[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (11 children)
I don't think it requests the certificate anew, though. According to my theory, the bug would still occur if you disconnected the internet connection. That's why they couldn't just patch it server-side, and had to push something through to the actual installed copies of Firefox – using the push-through system that's easy to turn off and I can't remember whether it's on by default.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (10 children)
I think it's all enabled by default. I'm done with Mozilla, someone out there respects their own goddamn users.
I just read a story about how they popped up special Mr Robot ads to everyone a few years ago.
[–]ikidd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
What's the choice, Google Chrome, or Google Edge, or Google Chromium, or Google Vivaldi?
Overall, Firefox is the closest thing we have to a large userbase browser with fair support that isn't part of the Google spying machine.
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Well, there are Firefox forks.
[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (7 children)
The Mr Robot ad only came up to users who hadn't opted out – which I know isn't good enough; I disagree with Mozilla's new "opt-out" policy too – and they apologised for it.
Mozilla needs to change, but is this really what made you want to drop it? A certificate expiration that was only an issue because Mozilla had limited ability to push things out to people's Firefox instances?
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (6 children)
The expiration doesn't bug me, it's the phone home and non privacy focused settings enabled by default. Yeah man I'm old and sick of this shit.
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (5 children)
So, this was just what made you re-evaluate and realise that you wouldn't put up with it any more? Mozilla's great, but the decisions they're having to make with Firefox to keep the funding from Google can only really be described as "compromised".
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
Technology and related articles and discussion
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HorseMeat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - (16 children)
[–]happysmash27 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (15 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (14 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (13 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (11 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]ikidd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)