you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HiddenFox 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Like all things AI, the path this technology takes will be utterly unpredictable. Given this article to be true, I never would have guessed you could reproduce ChatGPT level AIs at that cost and with this ease.

I do however think there is a silver lining (or possible disaster) to this. At some point with this technology running muck it will be impossible to believe anything you see, hear or read on the internet. It will render it useless for information purposes. Only walled off ecosystems will become trustworthy. But that too will also lead to manipulation as we have already seen. (IE google censorship.)

It will take some major event in deception where so many are fooled into something so preposterous, but in the end people's attitude will shift to the internet. Being nothing more then an endless space of lies and misinformation people will have little choice but to go backwards...

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The wealthy and powerful already had that type of technology, if slightly different. They simply employed armies of shills with force multiplier tech that allowed each shill to control thousands of accounts and personas.

You see it the most during election season. Shareblue, acorn, JIFD, etc. It is what allows them to build fake "grass roots" movements that (((they))) use to attack and manipulate the public and the government with. Groups like Antifa and BLM.

[–]EddieC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You see it the most during election season. Shareblue, acorn, JIFD, etc. It is what allows them to build fake "grass roots" movements that (((they))) use to attack and manipulate the public and the government with. Groups like Antifa and BLM.

So, do you see this (#1-#3) then?